DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Webb, 440 N.W.2d 426.

854 citing documents.

  • State v. Hatfield 627 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Yang 627 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Yang 627 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Carillo 623 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Carillo 623 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Tomlin 622 N.W.2d 546 Minn. 2001
  • State v. Tomlin 622 N.W.2d 546 Minn. 2001
    When faced with a sufficiency of the evidence claim, we must look at the record and determine whether the evidence “when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach the verdict which they did.”
  • State v. Matelski 622 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Greenfield 622 N.W.2d 403 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Matelski 622 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Greenfield 622 N.W.2d 403 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Henderson 620 N.W.2d 688 Minn. 2001
  • State v. Henderson 620 N.W.2d 688 Minn. 2001
  • State v. Breaux 620 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Woelfel 621 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Woelfel 621 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Breaux 620 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Smith 619 N.W.2d 766 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • State v. Smith 619 N.W.2d 766 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • State v. Barnes 618 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • State v. Barnes 618 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • State v. Gates 615 N.W.2d 331 Minn. 2000
  • State v. Gates 615 N.W.2d 331 Minn. 2000
    We look at the record “‘to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach the verdict which they did.’ ” ().
  • State v. Denison 607 N.W.2d 796 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • State v. Denison 607 N.W.2d 796 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • State v. Tovar 605 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 2000
  • State v. Tovar 605 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 2000
    In analyzing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting a conviction, we look at the record “to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach the verdict which they did.”
  • State v. Robinson 604 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 2000
  • State v. Robinson 604 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 2000
  • State v. Bakken 604 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • State v. Bakken 604 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • State v. Clow 600 N.W.2d 724 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • State v. Clow 600 N.W.2d 724 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
    When the sufficiency of the evidence is challenged, an appellate court must make a painstaking review of the record to determine if “the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach the verdict which they did.” (citation omitted).
  • State v. Bauer 598 N.W.2d 352 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Bauer 598 N.W.2d 352 Minn. 1999
    “A challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence requires ‘a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach the verdict which they did.’ ” ().
  • State v. Meemken 597 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • State v. Meemken 597 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
    When reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, this court reviews the record to determine “whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach the verdict which they did.”
  • State v. Schneider 597 N.W.2d 889 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Thames 599 N.W.2d 122 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Thames 599 N.W.2d 122 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Schneider 597 N.W.2d 889 Minn. 1999
    When an appeal is based on insufficient evidence, this court painstakingly reviews the record “to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach the verdict which they did.”
  • State v. Chuon 596 N.W.2d 267 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • State v. Chuon 596 N.W.2d 267 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • State v. Patch 594 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • State v. Patch 594 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • State v. Profit 591 N.W.2d 451 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Profit 591 N.W.2d 451 Minn. 1999
    In analyzing a challenge to the sufficiency of the state’s evidence, we review the record “to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach the verdict which they did.”
  • State v. Pelawa 590 N.W.2d 142 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • State v. Pelawa 590 N.W.2d 142 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • State v. Harris 589 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 1999