C2-89-1534 Precedential Reversed Processed

State v. Barsness

Minnesota Supreme Court · Filed March 12, 1990 · 473 N.W.2d 828

Also decided on this docket: Minn. Ct. App., November 15, 1989 446 N.W.2d 666

Cited by

Followed in 1

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Jayshawn Jarmell Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Jesse Bruce Jensen, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Russel Edward Straub, Jr. v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: F. F. N. M., … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2023
Stewart Edward Underhill, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Jesse M. Gregorich, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022

all 153 citing documents »

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

State v. Joon Kyu Kim 398 N.W.2d 544

Opinion text

ORDER WHEREAS, the trial court ruled that evidence of the defendant’s IQ is admissible with respect to determining intent as a fact issue; WHEREAS, the court of appeals reversed the trial court’s ruling; WHEREAS, in a pretrial appeal in a criminal case the trial court's determination will be reversed only if the state demonstrates both that the trial court erred in its judgment and, that unless reversed, the error will have a critical impact on the outcome of the trial. State v. Joon Kyu Kim, 398 N.W.2d 544 (Minn.1987); and WHEREAS, this court finds that the appellant has not established that the trial court’s order will have a critical impact on the outcome of the trial; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the court of appeals be, and the same is, reversed and the matter is remanded for immediate trial.