State v. Barsness
Also decided on this docket: Minn. Ct. App., November 15, 1989 446 N.W.2d 666
State v. Barsness, 473 N.W.2d 828 (Minn. 1990).
Cited by
Followed in 1
- Scot Theodore Fenske v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Angelette Marie Crumble Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Jacquelyn Jeanne Libis Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota v. Jayshawn Jarmell Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- Jesse Bruce Jensen v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- Russel Edward Straub, Jr. v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: F. F. N. M., … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota v. Kyle Duwayne Harms Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota, Minn. 2023
- Stewart Edward Underhill v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota v. Jeremiah Park Hess Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- Jesse M. Gregorich v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Joon Kyu Kim 398 N.W.2d 544
Opinion text
ORDER WHEREAS, the trial court ruled that evidence of the defendant’s IQ is admissible with respect to determining intent as a fact issue; WHEREAS, the court of appeals reversed the trial court’s ruling; WHEREAS, in a pretrial appeal in a criminal case the trial court's determination will be reversed only if the state demonstrates both that the trial court erred in its judgment and, that unless reversed, the error will have a critical impact on the outcome of the trial. State v. Joon Kyu Kim, 398 N.W.2d 544 (Minn.1987); and WHEREAS, this court finds that the appellant has not established that the trial court’s order will have a critical impact on the outcome of the trial; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the court of appeals be, and the same is, reversed and the matter is remanded for immediate trial.