In re the Minor Modification to the Solid Waste Permit SW-61 for the Type I Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator Ash Storage Facility at the Woodlake Sanitary Landfill
The holding in the court’s own words
We hold that service by relator Earth Protector upon the assistant attorney general satisfied the statutory service requirements.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.
Cited by
- Sorenson v. Life Style, Inc. 674 N.W.2d 439 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- Savre v. Independent School District No. 283 642 N.W.2d 467 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Scientific Computers, Inc. 388 N.W.2d 748
- State v. Werman 388 N.W.2d 748
- State v. Scientific Computers, Inc. 384 N.W.2d 560
Opinion text
SPECIAL TERM OPINION PARKER, Judge. FACTS Relator Earth Protector seeks review of the denial of its request for a contested case hearing on an application for modification of a permit issued to Woodlake Sanitary Services. The Pollution Control Agency moves to discharge the writ of certiora-ri, claiming 'that relator failed to make timely service upon the agency. DECISION A petition for certiorari must be “served on the agency” within 30 days after a party receives the final agency decision. Minn. Stat. § 14.63 (1988). Earth Protector served the assistant attorney general who had represented the agency throughout pri- or proceedings within the time allowed, but did not serve the agency separately. The agency argues that service upon the assistant attorney general is insufficient. The agency’s argument has been rejected previously by the supreme court. State v. Scientific Computers, Inc., 388 N.W.2d 748 (Minn.), rev’g, 384 N.W.2d 560 (Minn.Ct.App.1986). In Scientific Computers, this court held that service upon the special assistant attorney general representing the Department of Human Services did not constitute service upon the agency, within the meaning of Minn.Stat. § 14.63. The supreme court reversed, deemed service to be sufficient, and remanded to this court for consideration of the appeal on the merits. The agency has made no attempt to distinguish Scientific Computers. We hold that service by relator Earth Protector upon the assistant attorney general satisfied the statutory service requirements. Motion to discharge certiorari denied.