Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Fingerhut Corp. v. Suburban National Bank, 460 N.W.2d 63.

28 citing documents.

Imperial Developers, Inc. v. Calhoun Development, LLC 775 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Imperial Developers, Inc. v. Calhoun Development, LLC 775 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
1 (2008) (“The act of registration shall be the operative act to convey or affect the land.”); Fingerhut Corp. v. Suburban Nat’l Bank, -66 (Minn.App.1990).
Mavco, Inc. v. Eggink 739 N.W.2d 148 Minn. 2007
Mavco, Inc. v. Eggink 739 N.W.2d 148 Minn. 2007
In Re Collier 711 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re Collier 711 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re Ocwen Financial Services, Inc. 649 N.W.2d 854 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re Ocwen Financial Services, Inc. 649 N.W.2d 854 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Fingerhut Corp. v. Suburban Nat’l Bank
Chaney v. Minneapolis Community Development Agency 641 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Distinguished Chaney v. Minneapolis Community Development Agency 641 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
See generally Marr v. Bradley, 239 Minn. 503 , Fingerhut Corp. v. Suburban Nat’l Bank
Marshall County v. State 636 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marshall County v. State 636 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Fingerhut Corp. v. Suburban Nat’l Bank
Programmed Land, Inc. v. O'CONNOR 602 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Programmed Land, Inc. v. O'CONNOR 602 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Fingerhut Corp. v. Suburban Nat’l Bank
Guderian v. Olmsted County 595 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Guderian v. Olmsted County 595 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Fingerhut Corp. v. Suburban Nat’l Bank
Oslund v. Johnson 567 N.W.2d 89 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Oslund v. Johnson 567 N.W.2d 89 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Fingerhut Corp. v. Suburban Nat’l Bank
Scanlan v. Nielsen 561 N.W.2d 917 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Scanlan v. Nielsen 561 N.W.2d 917 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
In Fingerhut Corp. v. Suburban Nat’l Bank, we addressed the question of whether an interest in property was effective before registration: The answer is, with respect to registered property, unequivocally no. That is because “the act of registration shall be the operative act to convey or affect the land.” Id.
City of Pine Springs v. One 1992 Harley Davidson, VIN: 1HD1DJL10NY510116, License No: 20438MC 555 N.W.2d 749 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
City of Pine Springs v. One 1992 Harley Davidson, VIN: 1HD1DJL10NY510116, License No: 20438MC 555 N.W.2d 749 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Fingerhut Corp. v. Suburban Nat’l Bank
Stillwater Township v. Rivard 547 N.W.2d 906 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Stillwater Township v. Rivard 547 N.W.2d 906 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Fingerhut Corp. v. Suburban Nat’l Bank
VanWagner v. Mattison 533 N.W.2d 75 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
VanWagner v. Mattison 533 N.W.2d 75 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Fingerhut Corp. v. Suburban Nat’l Bank
Host v. Host 497 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Host v. Host 497 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Fingerhut Corp. v. Suburban Nat’l Bank, ().

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by