Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lilyerd v. Carlson, 499 N.W.2d 803.

25 citing documents.

Community Housing Services - Park Towers, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Th e limited nature of this relief is consistent with the limited nature of an eviction action, which is a “s ummary proceeding[] that [is] intended to adjudicate only the limited question of present possessory rights to the property.” Deutsche Bank Nat’l ().
Larry Wajda, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
4 (2016); d 803, 812 (Minn. 1993); d.
U. S. Bank National Association as Legal Title Trustee for Truman 2012 SC Title Trust v. Thomas J. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
U. S. Bank National Association as Legal Title Trustee for Truman 2012 SC Title Trust v. Thomas J. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Gregory Ross Wickenhauser v. Denise Esther Wickenhauser, n/k/a Denise Esther Peterson, (A14-0417), and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Gregory Ross Wickenhauser v. Denise Esther Wickenhauser, n/k/a Denise Esther Peterson, (A14-0417), and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Hanson 841 N.W.2d 161 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Hanson 841 N.W.2d 161 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. R.H.B. 821 N.W.2d 817 Minn. 2012
State v. R.H.B. 821 N.W.2d 817 Minn. 2012
City of North Oaks v. Sarpal 797 N.W.2d 18 Minn. 2011
City of North Oaks v. Sarpal 797 N.W.2d 18 Minn. 2011
See, (bench trial); Nadeau v. Cnty.
Bob Acres, LLC v. Schumacher Farms, LLC 797 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Bob Acres, LLC v. Schumacher Farms, LLC 797 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Minneapolis Grand, LLC v. Galt Funding LLC 791 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Minneapolis Grand, LLC v. Galt Funding LLC 791 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
When reviewing an equitable remedy, “[appellate courts] have not interfered unless the [district] court clearly abuses its discretion.”
Real Estate Equity Strategies, LLC v. Jones 720 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Real Estate Equity Strategies, LLC v. Jones 720 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
(stating “[w]hile an unlawful detainer action is generally summary in nature, determines only present possessory rights, and usually *358 does not bar subsequent actions involving title or equitable rights of the parties, the counterclaim here could have been tried to a jury” (emphasis added) (citatio
Ag Services of America, Inc. v. Schroeder 693 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Ag Services of America, Inc. v. Schroeder 693 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
(noting that equitable remedies such as specific performance and setting aside an agreement are appropriate in right of first refusal actions); Harbal, d at 448-49 (affirming avoidance of sale as necessary for the enforcement of the statutory right of first refusal).
AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange 631 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange 631 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Pine Valley Meats, Inc. v. Canal Capital Corp. 566 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Pine Valley Meats, Inc. v. Canal Capital Corp. 566 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Eagan East Ltd. Partnership v. Powers Investigations, Inc. 554 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 1996