Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Richards v. Milwaukee Insurance Co., 518 N.W.2d 26.

25 citing documents.

Ronning v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 887 N.W.2d 35 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Ronning v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 887 N.W.2d 35 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Co., (noting that preventing double recovery is a “primary objective” of the No-Fault Act).
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Angela Mary Lennartson, Katie Foss 872 N.W.2d 524 Minn. 2015
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Angela Mary Lennartson, Katie Foss 872 N.W.2d 524 Minn. 2015
Co., (“[Underinsured motorist] coverage is a tort based coverage designed to provide a supplemental source of recovery only when the damages that the insured is legally entitled to recover from the toHfeasor exceed the tortfeasor’s liability insurance limits.” (emphasis added)); McIntosh v. State Farm Mut.
Do v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 779 N.W.2d 853 Minn. 2010
Do v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 779 N.W.2d 853 Minn. 2010
Do v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 752 N.W.2d 109 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Do v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 752 N.W.2d 109 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Co., (determining that “actual damages” as used in the UIM statute refers to a tortfeasor’s liability “exclusive of those damages paid by no-fault coverage”).
Behr v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 638 N.W.2d 469 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Behr v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 638 N.W.2d 469 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Co., (stating that prevention of double recovery is “a primary objective of the no-fault act”).
Gusk v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 559 N.W.2d 421 Minn. 1997
Gusk v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 559 N.W.2d 421 Minn. 1997
Co., , 27 n. 1 (Minn.1994); Schmidt, d at 262; see also Broton v. Western Nat’l Mut.
Wertish v. Salvhus 558 N.W.2d 258 Minn. 1997
Wertish v. Salvhus 558 N.W.2d 258 Minn. 1997
rehearing denied (Minn, Aug.
Malmin v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co. 552 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1996
Lahr v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 551 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Lahr v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 551 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Co., and Johnson v. American Family Mut.
Malmin v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co. 541 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Malmin v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co. 541 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Co., (citing Nordstrom holding that tort judgment conclusively establishes entitlement to damages); Reinhardt v. Milwaukee Mut.
Dean v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 535 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 1995
Dean v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 535 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 1995
Co., Johnson v. American Family Mut.
Greenwaldt v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 526 N.W.2d 202 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Greenwaldt v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 526 N.W.2d 202 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Co., rev’d, the district court held that the offset provision of section 65B.51 is not applied in calculating actual damages for purposes of defining an underin-sured motor vehicle.
Reinhardt v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. 524 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Reinhardt v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. 524 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 1994