Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Paul, 548 N.W.2d 260.

40 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Heather Marie Mangen Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Heather Marie Mangen Minn. Ct. App. 2025
in which the officer initiated a traffic stop by activating his emergency lights and following the suspect on a highway and a city street.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Lakecia Gant, as trustee for the next-of-kin of Raven Bianca Gant v. Daniel Ledman, in his ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Lakecia Gant, as trustee for the next-of-kin of Raven Bianca Gant v. Daniel Ledman, in his ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
265 (Minn. 1996) (pursuing suspect); –73 (Minn. App. 1991) (providing emergency aid).
, A22-0103 Minn. Ct. App. 2023
d that probable cause of drunk driving existed when the officer “observed [the driver] roll through several stop signs, exceed the speed limit, and ‘fishtail’ on a highway,” and he “smelled alcohol on [the driver], heard his slurred speech, saw his watery eyes and flushed face, watched him experience difficulty standing, and was the subject of [the driv er’s] alcohol-induced gregariousness.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Shaw did not flee from a traffic stop or attempt to “defeat a warrantless arrest that [had] been set in motion in public by entering into a dwelling.” See Morin, d at 695; see also State v. Paul , (finding that police were in hot pursuit of defendant whe re officer activated his squad car lights and followed defendant, ordered defendant to stay in his vehicle, and ordered defendant to stop after he exited the vehicle); Koziol, d at 47-48 (finding that police were in hot pursuit of
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Winbush 912 N.W.2d 678 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Winbush 912 N.W.2d 678 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Paul , , 265 (Minn. 1996).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“When the facts are not in dispute and the district court’s decision is a question of law, this court may independently review the facts and determine as a matter of law whether the evidence need be suppressed.”
State v. Hernandez 399 P.3d 115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
State of Minnesota v. Debra Lee Fawcett 884 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Debra Lee Fawcett 884 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 2016
(explaining that the defendant’s driving conduct, including rolling through several stop signs, supported a finding of probable cause to believe the defendant was under the influence of an intoxicant).
State of Minnesota, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Bonnie Ann Lindquist, Appellant/Cross-Respondent. 869 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Derrick Irving Stevenson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Derrick Irving Stevenson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Lussier 770 N.W.2d 581 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Lussier 770 N.W.2d 581 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“In order to establish probable cause, the police must show that they reasonably could have believed that a crime has been committed by the person to be arrested.” (quotation omitted).
State v. Netland 762 N.W.2d 202 Minn. 2009
State v. Netland 762 N.W.2d 202 Minn. 2009
State v. Shriner 751 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 2008
State v. Shriner 751 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 2008
State v. Shriner 739 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Shriner 739 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Morin 736 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Morin 736 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Johnson 689 N.W.2d 247 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Johnson 689 N.W.2d 247 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In order to establish probable cause, the police must show that they “reasonably could have believed that a crime has been committed by the person to be arrested.” (quotation omitted).
In Re the Welfare of B.R.K. 658 N.W.2d 565 Minn. 2003
In Re the Welfare of B.R.K. 658 N.W.2d 565 Minn. 2003
1684 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961)
State v. Baumann 616 N.W.2d 771 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Baumann 616 N.W.2d 771 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Taylor 590 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Taylor 590 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(citing Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 484 , 83 S.Ct.
State v. Martinson 581 N.W.2d 846 Minn. 1998
State v. Martinson 581 N.W.2d 846 Minn. 1998
see also Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 699 , 116 S.Ct.
In Re the Welfare of J.W.K. 574 N.W.2d 103 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
In Re the Welfare of J.W.K. 574 N.W.2d 103 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
ANALYSIS “The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I of the Minnesota Constitution proscribe unreasonable searches.”