Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite DLH, Inc. v. Russ, 566 N.W.2d 60.

761 citing documents.

Marc Hall v. Ramsey County Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Anita Haider, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Evi E. Kari v. Kenneth Kari Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Anita Haider, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Evi E. Kari v. Kenneth Kari Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Conversion is “an act of willful interference with personal property, done without lawful justification by which any person entitled thereto is deprived of use and possession.” DLH, (quotation omitted).
Marc Hall v. Ramsey County Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Starry Electric, Inc. v. Gilman Cooperative Creamery Association Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[S]ummary judgment is inappropriate when reasonable persons might draw different conclusions from the evidence presented.” DLH
Wolf, Rohr, Gemberling & Allen, P. A. v. Margots Kapacs Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Wolf, Rohr, Gemberling & Allen, P. A. v. Margots Kapacs Minn. Ct. App. 2016
To defeat summary judgment, the nonmoving party must do more than “create[] a metaphysical doubt as to a factual issue” or “rest on mere averments.” DLH
Anibal Sanchez v. Dahlke Trailer Sales, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Anibal Sanchez v. Dahlke Trailer Sales, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Ann Majerus v. Harvey L. Huyser, Barbara St. John, Tony Montgomery Realty and Auction Company Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Ann Majerus v. Harvey L. Huyser, Barbara St. John, Tony Montgomery Realty and Auction Company Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[W]hen the nonmoving party bears the burden of proof on an element essential to the nonmoving party’s case, the nonmoving party must make a showing sufficient to establish that essential element.” DLH
Gregg H. Johnson, William Flies v. Township of Florence, State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
James E. Williams v. David L. Stussy Minn. Ct. App. 2016
James E. Williams v. David L. Stussy Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Gregg H. Johnson, William Flies v. Township of Florence, State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Delmer v. Fladwood v. City of St. Paul Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Valley Paving, Inc. v. Stanley Consultants, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Valley Paving, Inc. v. Stanley Consultants, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Delmer v. Fladwood v. City of St. Paul Minn. Ct. App. 2016
DLH, d 60, 69 (Minn. 1997).
North Star Mutual Insurance Company v. Julie Joy Kruger, as trustee for the heirs and next of kin … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Lifespan of Minnesota, Inc. v. Minneapolis Public Schools, Special School District No. 1. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
North Star Mutual Insurance Company v. Julie Joy Kruger, as trustee for the heirs and next of kin … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Lifespan of Minnesota, Inc. v. Minneapolis Public Schools, Special School District No. 1. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
4 “The district court’s function on a motion for summary judgment is not to decide issues of fact, but solely to determine whether genuine factual issues exist.” DLH
Steven Duane Auers, personally, and as trustee for the next of kin of Karen Auers v. Progressive Direct … 878 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Steven Duane Auers, personally, and as trustee for the next of kin of Karen Auers v. Progressive Direct … 878 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
No genuine issue exists “[w]here the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party.” DLH, (quotation omitted).
Excel Manufacturing, Inc. v. Todd Wondrow Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Excel Manufacturing, Inc. v. Todd Wondrow Minn. Ct. App. 2016
There is no genuine issue of material fact for trial “when the nonmoving party presents evidence which merely creates a metaphysical doubt as to a factual issue and which is not sufficiently probative with respect to an essential element of the nonmoving party’s case to permit reasonable persons to draw different conclusions.” DLH
Nereus Montemayor v. Sebright Products, Inc., d/b/a Bright Technologies, and third party v. VZ Hogs, LLP, Third Party Minn. Ct. App. 2016
James L. Mandel v. Multiband Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Nereus Montemayor v. Sebright Products, Inc., d/b/a Bright Technologies, and third party v. VZ Hogs, LLP, Third Party Minn. Ct. App. 2016
DLH, d 60, 69 (Minn. 1997).
James L. Mandel v. Multiband Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2016
which is not sufficiently probative with respect to an essential element of the nonmoving party’s case to permit reasonable persons to draw different conclusions.” DLH
Greg Peterson, Souphanny Dean, Co-Appellant, Brian Rogge v. City of Richfield, Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Greg Peterson, Souphanny Dean, Co-Appellant, Brian Rogge v. City of Richfield, Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Enoch Klingbeil v. Krystal Lee Ramfjord Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Enoch Klingbeil v. Krystal Lee Ramfjord Minn. Ct. App. 2016
DLH, d 60, 69 (Minn. 1997).
Isanti Estates, LLC v. McCarthy Well Company, McCullough & Sons, Incorporated d/b/a McCullough & Sons Well Drilling, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Isanti Estates, LLC v. McCarthy Well Company, McCullough & Sons, Incorporated d/b/a McCullough & Sons Well Drilling, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
defined as an act of willful interference with personal property, ‘done without lawful justification by which any person entitled thereto is deprived of use and possession.’” DLH, (internal citation and quotation omitted).
Lois St. Aubin v. Caseys Retail Company d/b/a Caseys General Store Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Willie J. Bridgeforth, III, Susan J. Swanson v. Smith Strum Investment Co. d/b/a Winnetka Village Apartments Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Willie J. Bridgeforth, III, Susan J. Swanson v. Smith Strum Investment Co. d/b/a Winnetka Village Apartments Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“The district court’s function on a motion for summary judgment is not to decide issues of fact, but solely to determine whether genuine factual issues exist.” DLH
Lois St. Aubin v. Caseys Retail Company d/b/a Caseys General Store Minn. Ct. App. 2016
No genuine issue exists “[w]here 4 the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party.” DLH, (quotation omitted).
Kenneth H. Zimmermann, Gary C. Berndt v. Sauk River Watershed District Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Kenneth H. Zimmermann, Gary C. Berndt v. Sauk River Watershed District Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[T]he party resisting summary judgment must do more than rest on mere averments.” DLH
Arrow Southampton, LLC v. Jeremiah Akinnola Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Arrow Southampton, LLC v. Jeremiah Akinnola Minn. Ct. App. 2016
DLH, –71 (Minn. 1997) (“[T]he party resisting summary judgment must do more than rest on mere averments.”).
CSM Equities, LLC v. Woodland Village Investments Limited Partnership Minn. Ct. App. 2016
CSM Equities, LLC v. Woodland Village Investments Limited Partnership Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[S]ummary judgment is inappropriate when reasonable persons might draw different conclusions from the evidence presented.” DLH
Contractors Edge, Inc. v. City of Mankato Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Cameron Anderson v. North American Gear & Forge Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Contractors Edge, Inc. v. City of Mankato Minn. Ct. App. 2016