Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite DLH, Inc. v. Russ, 566 N.W.2d 60.

761 citing documents.

Cheryl A. Hansen v. The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Chad Schirmers v. County of Anoka Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Chad Schirmers v. County of Anoka Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“[T]he party resisting summary judgment must do more than rest on mere averments.” DLH
Souhsiung Jack Chiu v. Timbershore Home Owners' Association, and third party v. New Horizon Homes, Inc., Third Party Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Souhsiung Jack Chiu v. Timbershore Home Owners' Association, and third party v. New Horizon Homes, Inc., Third Party Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Petition of Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation for a New Certificate of Title … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Petition of Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation for a New Certificate of Title … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
No genuine issue of material fact exists when “the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party.” DLH
Nicole Curtis v. Jason Jenny Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Nicole Curtis v. Jason Jenny Minn. Ct. App. 2015
No genuine issue of material fact exists “[w]here the record taken as a whole 3 could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party.” DLH, (alteration in original) (quotation omitted).
Michael Harlow v. State of Minnesota Department of Human Services 862 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Michael Harlow v. State of Minnesota Department of Human Services 862 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
But “the party resisting summary judgment must do more than rest on mere averments.” DLH
Scott R. McKee, M. D. v. St. Paul Eye Clinic, P. A. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Temitope Raufu Ibraheem v. Epic Entertainment, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Temitope Raufu Ibraheem v. Epic Entertainment, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
No genuine issue of material fact exists when “the nonmoving party presents evidence which merely creates a metaphysical doubt as to a factual issue and which is not sufficiently probative with respect to an essential element of the nonmoving party’s case to permit reasonable persons to draw different conclusions.” DLH
Scott R. McKee, M. D. v. St. Paul Eye Clinic, P. A. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
No genuine issue for trial exists “[w]here the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party.” DLH, (alteration in original) (quoting Matushita Elec.
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Paul v. Pope, Gretchen A. Pope Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Martin L. McDonal v. SuperValu, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Wayne Earl Dahl v. Stephen Sean Cummings Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Wayne Earl Dahl v. Stephen Sean Cummings Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Martin L. McDonal v. SuperValu, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
DLH, see also Risdall v. Brown-Wilbert, Inc., (“A self-serving affidavit that contradicts other testimony is not sufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact.”).
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Paul v. Pope, Gretchen A. Pope Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Even when viewed in the light most favorable to him, the generic Freddie Mac documents and agreements Pope cites have limited relevance and at best create only “metaphysical doubt as to a factual issue.” DLH
Mavco, Inc. d/b/a Maverick Construction Company v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Mavco, Inc. d/b/a Maverick Construction Company v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Vaambee Yang, John Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Vaambee Yang, John Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See DLH, (“[T]here is no genuine issue of material fact .
Tracey Weathers v. HSBC Bank USA, NA, as Trustee for GSAA Home Equity Trust 2005-6 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Pat Ritter v. Auntie Ruth's Animal Care and Wellness, Inc. d/b/a Auntie Ruth's Furry Friends Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Tracey Weathers v. HSBC Bank USA, NA, as Trustee for GSAA Home Equity Trust 2005-6 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Pat Ritter v. Auntie Ruth's Animal Care and Wellness, Inc. d/b/a Auntie Ruth's Furry Friends Minn. Ct. App. 2015
However, the district court “is not required to ignore its conclusion that a particular piece of evidence may have no probative value, such that reasonable persons could not draw different conclusions from the evidence presented.” DLH
J. D. Donovan, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation Minn. Ct. App. 2015
328 Barry Avenue, LLC v. Nolan Properties Group, LLC, and third party v. Carciofini Company, third party Marvin … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
J. D. Donovan, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation Minn. Ct. App. 2015
328 Barry Avenue, LLC v. Nolan Properties Group, LLC, and third party v. Carciofini Company, third party Marvin … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See DLH, (“[T]he party resisting summary judgment must do more than rest on mere averments.”).
Gary A. Meiners v. Kruckow Companies, LLC, and third party v. Anthony R. Hammell, third party Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Gary A. Meiners v. Kruckow Companies, LLC, and third party v. Anthony R. Hammell, third party Minn. Ct. App. 2015
William J. Cavanagh v. Allen R. Arvig, Chris Mensing, individually and d/b/a Lakes Country Landscaping & Irrigation, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
William J. Cavanagh v. Allen R. Arvig, Chris Mensing, individually and d/b/a Lakes Country Landscaping & Irrigation, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
But a genuine issue of material fact does not exist “when the nonmoving party presents evidence which merely creates a metaphysical doubt as to a factual issue and which is not sufficiently probative with respect to an essential element of the nonmoving party’s case to permit reasonable persons to draw different conclusions.” DLH
James Ariola as next of kin and trustee for Jack Ariola Erenberg, his son v. The City of … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
James Ariola as next of kin and trustee for Jack Ariola Erenberg, his son v. The City of … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See, e.g., DLH, (explaining that “there is no genuine issue for trial when the nonmoving party presents evidence which merely creates a metaphysical doubt as to a factual issue and which is not sufficiently probative with respect to an essential element of the nonmoving party’s case to permit reasonable persons t
Jacky L. Larson v. The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, CMInformation Specialists, Inc. 855 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 2014
Jacky L. Larson v. The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, CMInformation Specialists, Inc. 855 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 2014
Summary judgment is “inappropriate when reasonable persons might draw different conclusions from the evidence presented.” DLH, d 60, 69 (Minn. 1997).
Donya L. Dawson v. Afton Alps Recreation Area Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Lakeview Methodist Health Care Center v. Kaci Paradis Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Lakeview Methodist Health Care Center v. Kaci Paradis Minn. Ct. App. 2014
A party resisting summary judgment must do more than provide “mere averments.” DLH
Donya L. Dawson v. Afton Alps Recreation Area Minn. Ct. App. 2014
No genuine issue for trial exists when “the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party.” DLH, (quoting Matsuhita Elec.
Kay Tellinghuisen v. Chrysler Group, LLC, a foreign limited liability company transacting business in the State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Kay Tellinghuisen v. Chrysler Group, LLC, a foreign limited liability company transacting business in the State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
But a party may not avoid summary judgment by resting on mere averments or presenting evidence that “merely creates a metaphysical doubt as to a factual issue.” DLH
In the matter of the Petition of Melrose Community, LLC for a revision of the legal descriptions reflected … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the matter of the Petition of Melrose Community, LLC for a revision of the legal descriptions reflected … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
No genuine factual issue exists “when the nonmoving party presents evidence which merely creates a metaphysical doubt as to a factual issue and which is not sufficiently probative with respect to an essential element of the nonmoving party’s case to permit reasonable persons to draw different conclusions.” DLH
Timothy Albert Collins v. EMC Insurance Companies Minn. Ct. App. 2014