Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Givens, 544 N.W.2d 774.

107 citing documents.

State v. Saue 688 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Saue 688 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Heath 685 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Heath 685 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Rourke 681 N.W.2d 35 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Rourke 681 N.W.2d 35 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
the supreme court held that a defendant could waive sentencing under the guidelines.
Hutchinson v. State 679 N.W.2d 160 Minn. 2004
Hutchinson v. State 679 N.W.2d 160 Minn. 2004
-77 (Minn.1996), we were asked to establish a rebuttable presumption that if the defendant agrees to a departure as part of a plea bargain, the departure needs no additional justification.
State v. Bendzula 675 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Bendzula 675 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Pirsig 670 N.W.2d 610 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Pirsig 670 N.W.2d 610 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Hickman 666 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Hickman 666 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Asfaha v. State 665 N.W.2d 523 Minn. 2003
Asfaha v. State 665 N.W.2d 523 Minn. 2003
State v. Williams 664 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Williams 664 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
1880, 1884 , 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981)
State v. Kilgore 661 N.W.2d 654 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Borrego 661 N.W.2d 663 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Kilgore 661 N.W.2d 654 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(quoting Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct.
State v. Borrego 661 N.W.2d 663 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
The purpose of the sentencing guidelines is simply to “offer a measure of evenhandedness and predictability to defendants” and to ensure their sentences are not based “upon inappropriate grounds such as race, gender, social or economic status.”
State v. Leja 660 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Leja 660 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Copeland 656 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Copeland 656 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Hearn 647 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Hearn 647 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. DeShay 645 N.W.2d 185 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. DeShay 645 N.W.2d 185 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Misquadace 644 N.W.2d 65 Minn. 2002
State v. Misquadace 644 N.W.2d 65 Minn. 2002
that a defendant could waive sentencing under the guidelines, but that the statute underlying this court’s reasoning in Givens was subsequently changed by the legislature.
State v. Mendoza 638 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Mendoza 638 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Gebeck 635 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Gebeck 635 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Misquadace 629 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Misquadace 629 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Oberg 627 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Oberg 627 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Hoelzel 621 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Leroy 604 N.W.2d 75 Minn. 1999
State v. Leroy 604 N.W.2d 75 Minn. 1999
While a defendant may knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waive a known right, we question whether a defendant can, through waiver, confer on the state the power to reprosecute following acquittal.
State v. Hough 585 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1998
State v. Hough 585 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1998
(stat-tag that victim's vulnerability due to age “which was known to” and "actively capitalized on” by defendant constituted valid aggravating factor).
State v. Garcia 582 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1998
State v. Humes 581 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1998
State v. Humes 581 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1998
(holding that the defendant could waive his right to be sentenced according to the sentencing guidelines).
State v. Garcia 582 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1998
See, (holding that defendant was bound by plea bargain to reimburse state for extradition costs despite the fact that the state would not otherwise have authority to require reimbursement); (holding that defendants may agree to departure from sentencing guidelines in plea bargain).
State v. Behl 573 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 1998