Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Griller, 583 N.W.2d 736.
- State of Minnesota v. Steven Anthony Ehlen Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Robert Edward Collins, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Katherine Trinka Olson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Katherine Trinka Olson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Javier Zapien-Arreola Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Daniel Peter Frisch v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Javier Zapien-Arreola Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Daniel Peter Frisch v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- State v. Ayala-Leyva 848 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
State v. Ayala-Leyva
848 N.W.2d 546
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
An error affects substantial rights if it is “prejudicial and affected the outcome of the case.”
- State v. Vang 847 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 2014
- State v. Vang 847 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 2014
- State v. Wenthe 845 N.W.2d 222 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
State v. Wenthe
845 N.W.2d 222
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
An error affects substantial rights if it is “prejudicial and affect[s] the outcome of the case.”
- Gulbertson v. State 843 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 2014
- Gulbertson v. State 843 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 2014
- State v. Watkins 840 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 2013
-
State v. Watkins
840 N.W.2d 21
Minn. 2013
(citing Johnson v. United States, 520 U.S. 461, 466-67 , 117 S.Ct.
- State v. Hicks 837 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
-
State v. Hicks
837 N.W.2d 51
Minn. Ct. App. 2013
(stating that the “defendant bears the burden of persuasion on this third prong” and that appellate courts “consider this to be a heavy burden”).
- Poppler v. Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Ass'n 834 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
- Poppler v. Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Ass'n 834 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
- State v. Kelley 832 N.W.2d 447 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
-
State v. Kelley
832 N.W.2d 447
Minn. Ct. App. 2013
“[B]efore an appellate court reviews an unobjected-to error, there must be (1) error; (2) that is plain; and (3) the error must affect substantial rights.”
- State v. Hayes 831 N.W.2d 546 Minn. 2013
- State v. Hayes 831 N.W.2d 546 Minn. 2013
- State v. Dao Xiong 829 N.W.2d 391 Minn. 2013
- State v. Dao Xiong 829 N.W.2d 391 Minn. 2013
- State v. McElroy 828 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
- State v. McElroy 828 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
- State v. Hayes 826 N.W.2d 799 Minn. 2013
-
State v. Hayes
826 N.W.2d 799
Minn. 2013
An error affects a defendant’s substantial rights if the error was “prejudicial and affected the outcome of the case.”
- State v. Smith 825 N.W.2d 131 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
- State v. Smith 825 N.W.2d 131 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
- State v. Hokanson 821 N.W.2d 340 Minn. 2012
- State v. Hokanson 821 N.W.2d 340 Minn. 2012
- State v. Milton 821 N.W.2d 789 Minn. 2012
- State v. Davis 820 N.W.2d 525 Minn. 2012
-
State v. Milton
821 N.W.2d 789
Minn. 2012
If these three prongs of our plain-error test are met, we then decide whether we must “address the error to ensure fairness and the integrity of the judicial proceedings.”
- State v. Davis 820 N.W.2d 525 Minn. 2012
- State v. Watkins 820 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
- State v. Watkins 820 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
- State v. McCauley 820 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
-
State v. McCauley
820 N.W.2d 577
Minn. Ct. App. 2012
(stating that error is plain if it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct”); (stating that error is “plain” when it is “clear” or “obvious”); (stating that to satisfy the second prong, “it is sufficient that the error is plain at the time of the appeal”).
- State v. Barajas 817 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
-
State v. Barajas
817 N.W.2d 204
Minn. Ct. App. 2012
P. 31.02 (stating that appellate court may consider plain error affecting substantial rights even if such error was not raised before district court); Bauer, d at 363 (establishing appellant’s burden to demonstrate district court’s error); (applying rule 31.02).
- State v. Ards 816 N.W.2d 679 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
- State v. Ards 816 N.W.2d 679 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
- State v. Hohenwald 815 N.W.2d 823 Minn. 2012
-
State v. Hohenwald
815 N.W.2d 823
Minn. 2012
( (internal quotation marks omitted)).