Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Griller, 583 N.W.2d 736.
- State v. Goodloe 718 N.W.2d 413 Minn. 2006
-
State v. Goodloe
718 N.W.2d 413
Minn. 2006
P. 31.02; Earl, d at 720
- State v. Moon 717 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
- State v. Moon 717 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
- State v. Colbert 716 N.W.2d 647 Minn. 2006
- State v. Colbert 716 N.W.2d 647 Minn. 2006
- State v. Paul 716 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 2006
- State v. Paul 716 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 2006
- State v. Osborne 715 N.W.2d 436 Minn. 2006
- State v. Laine 715 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 2006
- State v. Laine 715 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 2006
- State v. Jackson 714 N.W.2d 681 Minn. 2006
- State v. Vance 714 N.W.2d 428 Minn. 2006
- State v. Vance 714 N.W.2d 428 Minn. 2006
- State v. Manthey 711 N.W.2d 498 Minn. 2006
- State v. Manthey 711 N.W.2d 498 Minn. 2006
- State v. Young 710 N.W.2d 272 Minn. 2006
- State v. Young 710 N.W.2d 272 Minn. 2006
- State v. Gillespie 710 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
- State v. Gillespie 710 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
- Turnage v. State 708 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 2006
-
Turnage v. State
708 N.W.2d 535
Minn. 2006
(stating absent plain error affecting a defendant’s substantial rights, a trial court does not err when it does not give a warranted jury instruction if the defendant has impliedly or expressly waived that instruction).
- State v. Swanson 707 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 2006
- State v. Penkaty 708 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 2006
- State v. Swanson 707 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 2006
- State v. Penkaty 708 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 2006
- State v. Maurstad 706 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
- State v. Maurstad 706 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
- State v. Allen 706 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 2005
- State v. Allen 706 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 2005
- State v. Adkins 706 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
-
State v. Adkins
706 N.W.2d 59
Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Plain-error involves an analysis of whether there was “(1) error; (2) that is plain; and (3) the error must affect substantial rights.”
- State v. MacLennan 702 N.W.2d 219 Minn. 2005
-
State v. MacLennan
702 N.W.2d 219
Minn. 2005
see Johnson v. U.S., 520 U.S. 461, 466-67 , 117 S.Ct.
- State v. Morton 701 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 2005
- State v. Morton 701 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 2005
- State v. Robinson 699 N.W.2d 790 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
- State v. Robinson 699 N.W.2d 790 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
- State v. Leake 699 N.W.2d 312 Minn. 2005
- State v. Leake 699 N.W.2d 312 Minn. 2005
- State v. Blanche 696 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 2005
-
State v. Blanche
696 N.W.2d 351
Minn. 2005
12 An upward sentencing departure requires “substantial and compelling circumstances in the record.”
- State v. Dahlin 695 N.W.2d 588 Minn. 2005
- State v. Dahlin 695 N.W.2d 588 Minn. 2005
- Auringer v. State 695 N.W.2d 640 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
- Auringer v. State 695 N.W.2d 640 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
- State v. Brooks 690 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- State v. Brooks 690 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- Bernhardt v. State 684 N.W.2d 465 Minn. 2004
- Bernhardt v. State 684 N.W.2d 465 Minn. 2004