Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hale v. State, 566 N.W.2d 923.

34 citing documents.

Thomas John Rassmussen, Jr., petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Williams v. State 760 N.W.2d 8 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Williams v. State 760 N.W.2d 8 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Jama v. State 756 N.W.2d 107 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Jama v. State 756 N.W.2d 107 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
“An evidentiary hearing is not required unless there are material facts in dispute which must be resolved to determine the postconviction claim on its merits.”
State v. Hughes 742 N.W.2d 460 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Hughes 742 N.W.2d 460 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Edwards 736 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Edwards 736 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Perry v. State 705 N.W.2d 572 Minn. 2005
Perry v. State 705 N.W.2d 572 Minn. 2005
Spann v. State 704 N.W.2d 486 Minn. 2005
Henderson v. State 675 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 2004
Henderson v. State 675 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 2004
State v. Jackson 655 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Jackson 655 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
“There is a strong presumption that a counsel’s performance falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance.”
Finne v. State 648 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Finne v. State 648 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Christopherson 644 N.W.2d 507 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Christopherson 644 N.W.2d 507 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Sanders 644 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Sanders 644 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Boitnott v. State 631 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 2001
Boitnott v. State 631 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 2001
3 (“The court may summarily deny a second or successive petition for similar relief on behalf of the same petitioner and may summarily deny a petition when the issues raised in it have previously been decided by the court of appeals or the supreme court in the same case.”); (“[0]nce a direct appeal has been taken, any matter raised and any claim known but not raised, will not be considered upon a subsequent petition for postconviction relief.
State v. Fedor 628 N.W.2d 164 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Fedor 628 N.W.2d 164 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Hummel v. State 617 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 2000
Hummel v. State 617 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 2000
Perry v. State 595 N.W.2d 197 Minn. 1999
Perry v. State 595 N.W.2d 197 Minn. 1999
Dunn v. State 578 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 1998
Dunn v. State 578 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 1998
Sutherlin v. State 574 N.W.2d 428 Minn. 1998
Sutherlin v. State 574 N.W.2d 428 Minn. 1998
Even if this claim were not procedurally barred, there is a “strong presumption that a counsel’s performance falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance.”