Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Gleason v. Metropolitan Council Transit Operations, 582 N.W.2d 216.

100 citing documents.

Vassallo ex rel. Brown v. Majeski 842 N.W.2d 456 Minn. 2014
Council Transit Operations
Curtis v. Klausler 802 N.W.2d 790 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Curtis v. Klausler 802 N.W.2d 790 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Council Transit Operations
Pigs R US, LLC v. Compton Township 770 N.W.2d 212 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Pigs R US, LLC v. Compton Township 770 N.W.2d 212 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Council Transit Operations
JW Ex Rel. BRW v. 287 INTER. DIST. 761 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
J.W. ex rel. B.R.W. v. 287 Intermediate District 761 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
JW Ex Rel. BRW v. 287 INTER. DIST. 761 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Council Transit Operations, -21 (Minn. 1998) (stating that a bus driver's failure to follow guidelines set by his employer was not protected by official immunity).
J.W. ex rel. B.R.W. v. 287 Intermediate District 761 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Council Transit Operations, -21 (Minn.1998) (stating that a bus driver’s failure to follow guidelines set by his employer was not protected by official immunity).
Mahoney & Hagberg v. Newgard 712 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Mahoney & Hagberg v. Newgard 712 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Council Transit Operations
Schroeder v. St. Louis County 708 N.W.2d 497 Minn. 2006
Schroeder v. St. Louis County 708 N.W.2d 497 Minn. 2006
Thompson v. City of Minneapolis 707 N.W.2d 669 Minn. 2006
Thompson v. City of Minneapolis 707 N.W.2d 669 Minn. 2006
Council Transit Operations
Brown v. City of Bloomington 706 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Brown v. City of Bloomington 706 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Council Transit Operations
Hyatt v. Anoka Police Department 700 N.W.2d 502 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Hyatt v. Anoka Police Department 700 N.W.2d 502 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Council Transit Operations
Meier v. City of Columbia Heights 686 N.W.2d 858 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Meier v. City of Columbia Heights 686 N.W.2d 858 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Council Transit Operations
Anderson v. Anoka Hennepin Independent School District 11 678 N.W.2d 651 Minn. 2004
Anderson v. Anoka Hennepin Independent School District 11 678 N.W.2d 651 Minn. 2004
Council Transit Operations
Sletten v. Ramsey County 675 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 2004
Sletten v. Ramsey County 675 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 2004
Council Transit Operations, ().
Podruch v. State, Department of Public Safety 674 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Podruch v. State, Department of Public Safety 674 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Council Transit Operations, aff'd in part, (official immunity does not bar suit if official acted without legal reasonableness and violated known right).
Zaske Ex Rel. Bratsch v. Lee 651 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Zaske Ex Rel. Bratsch v. Lee 651 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Council Transit Operations, -19 (Minn.1998).
Dokman v. County of Hennepin 637 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Dokman v. County of Hennepin 637 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Council Transit Operations
Fear v. Independent School District 911 634 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Fear v. Independent School District 911 634 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Council Transit Operations, -19 (Minn.1998).
Huttner v. State 637 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Huttner v. State 637 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
“The starting point for analysis of an immunity question is the identification of ‘the precise governmental conduct at issue.’ ” (quoting Watson by Hanson v. Metropolitan Transit Comm’n, ), aff 'd in part
Currie State Bank v. Schmitz 628 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Currie State Bank v. Schmitz 628 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Christopherson v. City of Albert Lea 623 N.W.2d 272 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Christopherson v. City of Albert Lea 623 N.W.2d 272 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Kuelbs v. Williams 609 N.W.2d 10 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Kuelbs v. Williams 609 N.W.2d 10 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Conlin v. City of Saint Paul 605 N.W.2d 396 Minn. 2000
Conlin v. City of Saint Paul 605 N.W.2d 396 Minn. 2000
Programmed Land, Inc. v. O'CONNOR 602 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Programmed Land, Inc. v. O'CONNOR 602 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Kelly v. City of Minneapolis 598 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1999
S.W. v. Spring Lake Park School District No. 16 592 N.W.2d 870 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
S.W. v. Spring Lake Park School District No. 16 592 N.W.2d 870 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Bloss v. University of Minnesota Board of Regents 590 N.W.2d 661 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Bloss v. University of Minnesota Board of Regents 590 N.W.2d 661 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
315 n. 1 (Minn. App.1997) (encouraging motion practice to test sufficiency of claim in order to preserve narrow operation of immunity), affd in part

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by