Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Juarez, 572 N.W.2d 286.

218 citing documents.

  • State v. Parker 585 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Parker 585 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1998
    (citing State v. Roberts, 296 Minn. 347, 353 , ).
  • State v. Hendrickson 584 N.W.2d 774 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
  • State v. Hendrickson 584 N.W.2d 774 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
    (if verdict is “surely unattributable” to error, error is harmless beyond reasonable doubt and conviction stands).
  • State v. Shannon 583 N.W.2d 579 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Shannon 583 N.W.2d 579 Minn. 1998
    As we said recently in State v. Juarez, “[I]f the verdict actually rendered was surely unattributable to the error, the error is harmless beyond a reasonable *586 doubt,” ().
  • State v. Buggs 581 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Buggs 581 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Ferguson 581 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Ferguson 581 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Thompson 578 N.W.2d 734 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Thompson 578 N.W.2d 734 Minn. 1998
    In a harmless error analysis we are guided by the principal that the error will be deemed harmless beyond a reasonable doubt “[i]f the verdict actually rendered was surely unattributable to the error * * ().
  • State v. Shoen 578 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Shoen 578 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 1998
    2078, 2081 , 124 L.Ed.2d 182 (1993)
  • State v. Mullen 577 N.W.2d 505 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Mullen 577 N.W.2d 505 Minn. 1998
    The verdict was “surely unattributable to the error.” (quoting Sullivan v. Louisiana, 508 U.S. 275, 278-82 , 113 S.Ct.
  • State v. Keeton 573 N.W.2d 378 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
  • State v. Keeton 573 N.W.2d 378 Minn. Ct. App. 1997