Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite D.A.B. v. Brown, 570 N.W.2d 168.
- Ashley Anderson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- John Donahue, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
A25-1002 A25-1008
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Brown , (concluding that “conspiracy count fails because it is not supported by an underlying tort”).
-
Great North Capital Consultants, Inc., Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. Brown, meaning that “there is no such thing as a civil action for conspiracy,” Harding, d at 825.
-
RSS Fridley, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, et al., Appellants,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Brown, (citing Harding v. Ohio Cas.
-
Farm Bureau Financial Services, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. Brown, –71 (Minn. App. 1997) (rejecting “counsel’s creative characterizations” and concluding that “this case is a malpractice action,” not one for breach of fiduciary duty).
- Samson Longtin, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- In Re: The Matter of the Petition for Project No. 77, Clay County Ditch No. 51-Lateral No. 3, … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
- Crow Wing Cooperative Power and Light Company, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-
Daniel J. Engstrom, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
d 168, 169-70 (Minn. App. 1997).
- Robert Allen Taylor Company v. United Credit Recovery, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, US Bancorp, a Delaware … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Robert Allen Taylor Company v. United Credit Recovery, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, US Bancorp, a Delaware … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- CSM Equities, LLC v. Woodland Village Investments Limited Partnership Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- CSM Equities, LLC v. Woodland Village Investments Limited Partnership Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Scott R. McKee, M. D. v. St. Paul Eye Clinic, P. A. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Scott R. McKee, M. D. v. St. Paul Eye Clinic, P. A. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Michael Alan Mooney v. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, Stephen L. Hemsley, William W. McGuire, David J. Lubben Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Julie L. Pfeiffer, Trustee on behalf of the heirs and next of kin of Dale R. Pfeiffer v. … 851 N.W.2d 626 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Michael Alan Mooney v. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, Stephen L. Hemsley, William W. McGuire, David J. Lubben Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Julie L. Pfeiffer, Trustee on behalf of the heirs and next of kin of Dale R. Pfeiffer v. … 851 N.W.2d 626 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Sipe v. STS Manufacturing, Inc. 822 N.W.2d 2 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
-
Sipe v. STS Manufacturing, Inc.
822 N.W.2d 2
Minn. Ct. App. 2012
v. Broum, (concluding that medical-malpractice two-year statute of limitations under section 541.07(1) applies when “the gravamen of the complaint sounds in medical malpractice” and declining “to permit the putative class to avoid showing injury or to circumvent the legislatively mandated statute of limitat
- In re the Estate of Neuman 819 N.W.2d 211 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
- In re the Estate of Neuman 819 N.W.2d 211 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
- Swenson v. Bender 764 N.W.2d 596 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
-
Swenson v. Bender
764 N.W.2d 596
Minn. Ct. App. 2009
v. Brown, see also Prince v. Sonnesyn, 222 Minn. 528, 535 , (describing partners’ duties as fiduciaries).
- Carlson v. Sala Architects, Inc. 732 N.W.2d 324 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- Carlson v. Sala Architects, Inc. 732 N.W.2d 324 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- Blatz v. Allina Health System 622 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- Shea v. Esensten 622 N.W.2d 130 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
-
Blatz v. Allina Health System
622 N.W.2d 376
Minn. Ct. App. 2001
v. Brown, (classifying claim that physician breached fiduciary duty by taking kickbacks from drug companies for prescribing certain drugs as medical-malpractice claim because scheme was “dependent on the medical diagnosis, treatment and care of the patients”).
-
Shea v. Esensten
622 N.W.2d 130
Minn. Ct. App. 2001
v. Brown, to illustrate that managed-care incentives go to the heart of a malpractice claim.
- Paulos v. Johnson 597 N.W.2d 316 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
Paulos v. Johnson
597 N.W.2d 316
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
v. Brown, (concluding physician’s medical advice to patients, given in connection with kickback scheme, arose in course of rendering medical treatment and was subjected to two-year statute); cf. Kaiser, d at 767 (holding blood bank not covered by two-year statute because physicians in charge did no
- Sather v. Woodland Liquors, Inc. 597 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
Sather v. Woodland Liquors, Inc.
597 N.W.2d 295
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
v. Brown, (reviewing court considers as true the complaint’s factual allegations).