Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Toughill v. Toughill, 609 N.W.2d 634.
- Marriage of Kielley v. Kielley 674 N.W.2d 770 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
-
Marriage of Kielley v. Kielley
674 N.W.2d 770
Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Shirk, d at 521-22 ; , 639 & n. 1.
- Evans v. Evans 672 N.W.2d 232 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
-
Evans v. Evans
672 N.W.2d 232
Minn. Ct. App. 2003
3 in support of his proposition that the judgment may be considered void.
- Marriage of Clark v. Clark 642 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
-
Marriage of Clark v. Clark
642 N.W.2d 459
Minn. Ct. App. 2002
(emphasis added) (footnote omitted).
- Braith v. Fischer 632 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- Braith v. Fischer 632 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele 621 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
-
Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele
621 N.W.2d 758
Minn. Ct. App. 2001
518.145] functionally overruled Tomscak and its progeny to the extent that those cases allowed vacation of stipulation-based dissolution judgments on grounds other than those listed in the statute.” (emphasis added).