Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Sutton v. Viking Oldsmobile Nissan, Inc., 623 N.W.2d 247.
- Chad Monson, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
Henry Hickman, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-53 (Minn. App. 2000) (concluding that claimed symptoms of depression, sleep difficulties, anxiety, inability to focus at work, and physical problems such as vomiting and headaches are not sufficient evidence of severe emotional distress), 7 rev’d on other grounds, Elstrom v. Indep.
-
Peggy R. Ek, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
But the supreme court has more recently held that “a plaintiff may seek punitive damages in an action for intentional damage to property where the only damage is to property, subject to the limitations of section 549.20.”
-
A18-1375
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(noting that the focus in determining whether punitive damages should be allowed is on the wrongdoer’s conduct rather than the resulting damages).
-
Peter J. Andersen, Sr., as Trustee for the Peter J. Andersen, Sr. Family Trust, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
1 (1978), which made punitive damages “available ‘only upon clear and convincing evidence that the acts of the defendant show a willful indifference to the rights or safety of others.’” Jensen v. Walsh , 50 (Minn. 2001) (quoting Minn. Stat. § 549.20, subd.
-
Kaytee Hooser v. Keith Anderson
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(“The purposes of punitive damages are to punish the perpetrator, to deter repeat behavior and to deter others from engaging in similar behavior.”).
- Kaytee Hooser v. Keith Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Terry Boyd v. BNSF Railway Company 858 N.W.2d 797 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
State of Minnesota v. Dontrell Dyna Flowers
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
No. 622 v. Keene Corp., -34 (Minn. 1994) (emphasis added)
- Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. Anda 789 N.W.2d 860 Minn. 2010
- Peterson v. BASF Corp. 675 N.W.2d 57 Minn. 2004
-
Peterson v. BASF Corp.
675 N.W.2d 57
Minn. 2004
Sutton v. Viking Oldsmobile Nissan, Inc.
- Williamson v. Prasciunas 661 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 652 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 2002