DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Trei, 624 N.W.2d 595.

64 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota v. Carmilla J. Thibodeau-Schoeszler Minn. Ct. App. 2014
  • State of Minnesota v. Carmilla J. Thibodeau-Schoeszler Minn. Ct. App. 2014
    2 review dismissed (Minn. June 22, 2001).
  • State of Minnesota v. Brandon Joseph Poitra Minn. Ct. App. 2014
  • State of Minnesota v. Christian Phillip Oberender Minn. Ct. App. 2014
  • State of Minnesota v. Christian Phillip Oberender Minn. Ct. App. 2014
    We reverse a pretrial probable-cause dismissal “only if the state demonstrates clearly and unequivocally that the district court erred in its judgment and, unless reversed, the error will have a critical impact on the outcome of the trial.” review dismissed (Minn. June 22, 2001).
  • State of Minnesota v. Brandon Joseph Poitra Minn. Ct. App. 2014
    (stating that critical impact is present when suppression of evidence leads to the dismissal of charges); (concluding that “[d]ismissal of a complaint satisfies the critical impact requirement” in a case where only one count of a multi-count complaint was dismissed), review dismissed (Minn. June 22, 2001).
  • State v. Gerard 832 N.W.2d 314 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
  • State v. Gerard 832 N.W.2d 314 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
    P. 28.04, the state must demonstrate “clearly and unequivocally that the district court erred in its judgment and, unless reversed, the error will have a critical impact on the outcome of the trial.”
  • State v. Dunson 770 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
  • State v. Dunson 770 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
    This court will reverse a probable-cause pretrial dismissal “only if the state demonstrates clearly and unequivocally that the district court erred in its judgment and, unless reversed, the error will have a critical impact on the outcome of the trial.” (granting the state’s request for a pretrial appeal of an order dismissing a criminal charge for lack of probable cause), review dismissed (Minn. June 22, 2001).
  • State v. Schmidt 701 N.W.2d 313 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
  • State v. Schmidt 701 N.W.2d 313 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
  • State v. White 692 N.W.2d 749 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
  • State v. White 692 N.W.2d 749 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
    review dismissed (Minn. June 22, 2001).