Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Custody of NAK, 649 N.W.2d 166.

65 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Jessica Michael Hudson v. Daniel Joseph Hudson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
A district court’s finding is clearly erroneous if this court “is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made” when “giving deference to the district court’s opportunity to evaluate witness credibility,” Goldman, d at 284 (quotations omitted), and “view[ing] the record in the light most favorable to the trial court’s findings,”
Rew ex rel. T.C.B. v. Bergstrom 845 N.W.2d 764 Minn. 2014
In re the Welfare of J.H. 844 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 2014
In re the Welfare of J.H. 844 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 2014
Ramirez v. Luna 830 N.W.2d 163 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Ramirez v. Luna 830 N.W.2d 163 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Wallin v. Wallin, 290 Minn. 261, 266
Marriage of Goldman v. Greenwood 748 N.W.2d 279 Minn. 2008
Marriage of Goldman v. Greenwood 748 N.W.2d 279 Minn. 2008
“Appellate review of custody determinations is limited to whether the district court *282 abused its discretion by making findings unsupported by the evidence or by improperly applying the law.”
In Re the Child of Evenson 729 N.W.2d 632 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Child of Evenson 729 N.W.2d 632 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Marriage of Goldman v. Greenwood 725 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
272, 273 (1895) (first observing that the child’s best interests rise above the interests of the parent, even where the parent’s interest is recognized by statute); , 176 (Minn.2002); review denied (Minn. May 16, 2006).
Lewis-Miller v. Ross 710 N.W.2d 565 Minn. 2006
Lewis-Miller v. Ross 710 N.W.2d 565 Minn. 2006
Johnson-Smolak v. Fink 703 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Johnson-Smolak v. Fink 703 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
(citing Wallin v. Wallin, 290 Minn. 261, 264-65 , -30 (1971)).