Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Civil Commitment of Martin, 661 N.W.2d 632.

23 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Jill C. McLarnon, AKA Jill Shelby. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Commitment of Martin, rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Angie Samantha Mattinas. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Commitment of Martin, rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Amy Jeankyoung Oh Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Amy Jeankyoung Oh Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Commitment of Martin, rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Jacquet Deon Munn. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
8(a); see also I n re Civil Commitment of Martin , (concluding that t he “presumption is not that a victim actually suffers serious emotional harm as a result of a defendant’s conduct; it is that the conduct creates a substantial likelihood of serious emotional harm” ), rev denied (Minn. Aug.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: James Allen Martin. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Commitment of Martin, rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
A21-0043 Minn. Ct. App. 2021
ntally from criminal confinement because it does not share two primary objectives: punishment and deterrence) ; see also Kansas v. Hendricks , 521 U.S. 346, 347, 117 S. Ct. 2072 , 2075 (1997) (holding that civil confinement does not violate Double Jeopardy clause because it does not amount to a second prosecution or punishment for convicted offense); (“Protections against double jeopardy are not implicated by the [sexually dangerous person] Act, because the purpose of commitment under the [sexua
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Daniel Leroy Patten. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
d 632, 638 (Minn. App. 2003), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Alan Joseph Schiller. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Kutiey W. Thuok. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
App. P. 103.04 (allowing appellate courts to take any action or review any matter in the interest of justice); In re Civil Commitment of Martin , , 640 n.3 (Minn. App. 2003) (invoking this aspect of rule 103.04 to address a question in the interests of justice), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Tyler Paul Gephart. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re Civil Commitment of Martin , 8 (Minn. App. 2003), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: John Joseph Kotowski. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: John Joseph Kotowski. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Gary George Spicer. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Gary George Spicer. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Civil Commitment of Navratil 799 N.W.2d 643 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
In re the Civil Commitment of Navratil 799 N.W.2d 643 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
review denied (Minn. Aug.
Citizens for Rule of Law v. Senate Committee on Rules & Administration 770 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Citizens for Rule of Law v. Senate Committee on Rules & Administration 770 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
P. 103.04 (providing that scope of review extends to “any other matter as the interest of justice may require”); , 640 n. 3 (Minn.App.2003) (reviewing in the interests of justice constitutional issue not reached by the district court but briefed and argued on appeal), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In Re the Civil Commitment of Stone 711 N.W.2d 831 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re the Civil Commitment of Stone 711 N.W.2d 831 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
review denied (Minn. Aug.
Whitten v. State 690 N.W.2d 561 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Whitten v. State 690 N.W.2d 561 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
P. 103.04 to review appellant’s due-process claims despite appellant’s lack of standing); , 640 n. 3 (Minn.App.2003) (invoking Minn. R. Civ.