Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite McClish v. Pan-O-Gold Baking Co., 336 N.W.2d 538.

34 citing documents.

Sundby v. City of St. Peter 693 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 2005
Sundby v. City of St. Peter 693 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 2005
Snyder v. Yellow Freight System 683 N.W.2d 788 Minn. 2004
Snyder v. Yellow Freight System 683 N.W.2d 788 Minn. 2004
WDSI, INC. v. County of Steele 672 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
WDSI, INC. v. County of Steele 672 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
“Moreover, statutory words and phrases must be construed according to the rules of grammar and common usage.”
Schmidgall v. FilmTec Corp. 644 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 2002
Vezina v. Best Western Inn Maplewood 627 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 2001
Vezina v. Best Western Inn Maplewood 627 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 2001
5, see McClish v. Pan-O-Gold, Baking Co., -42 (Minn.1983), and that the PTD benefits are subject to an offset under section 176.101, subdivision 4, once $25,000 in PTD benefits have been paid.
Whitener Ex Rel. Miller v. Dahl 625 N.W.2d 827 Minn. 2001
Whitener Ex Rel. Miller v. Dahl 625 N.W.2d 827 Minn. 2001
Freyholtz v. Blackduck School District 32 613 N.W.2d 757 Minn. 2000
Freyholtz v. Blackduck School District 32 613 N.W.2d 757 Minn. 2000
If the findings have been affirmed, however, we will not intrude unless the findings are “manifestly contrary to the evidence” or unless “the evidence clearly requires reasonable minds to adopt a contrary conclusion.” ().
State v. Bauman 552 N.W.2d 576 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Bauman 552 N.W.2d 576 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
(“[Statutory words and phrases must be construed according to the rules of grammar and common usage.”).
Ostrander Ex Rel. Ostrander v. Cone Mills, Inc. 445 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 1989
Ostrander Ex Rel. Ostrander v. Cone Mills, Inc. 445 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 1989
Grunst v. Immanuel-St. Joseph Hospital 424 N.W.2d 66 Minn. 1988
Grunst v. Immanuel-St. Joseph Hospital 424 N.W.2d 66 Minn. 1988
Redgate v. Sroga's Standard Service 421 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 1988
Redgate v. Sroga's Standard Service 421 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 1988
Douglas County Child Support Enforcement Unit v. Cavegn 420 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Douglas County Child Support Enforcement Unit v. Cavegn 420 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
The terms of a statute should be enforced according to their “plain meaning.” -43 (Minn.1983).
In Re Estate of Peck 416 N.W.2d 158 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re Estate of Peck 416 N.W.2d 158 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(workers’ compensation).
Hanmer v. Wes Barrette Masonry 403 N.W.2d 839 Minn. 1987
State v. Soto 378 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1985
State v. Soto 378 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1985
Wilken v. International Harvester Co. 363 N.W.2d 763 Minn. 1985
Wilken v. International Harvester Co. 363 N.W.2d 763 Minn. 1985
where we did say that only permanent total disability benefit payments could count toward the $25,-000 threshold for invoking the government disability benefit offset of section 176.101, subd.
Crow Wing County Social Services v. McDermond 363 N.W.2d 97 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Crow Wing County Social Services v. McDermond 363 N.W.2d 97 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Egeland v. City of Minneapolis 344 N.W.2d 597 Minn. 1984
Egeland v. City of Minneapolis 344 N.W.2d 597 Minn. 1984