Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Servin v. Servin, 345 N.W.2d 754.

104 citing documents.

Marriage of Danielson v. Danielson 392 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Jungbauer v. Jungbauer 391 N.W.2d 56 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Jungbauer v. Jungbauer 391 N.W.2d 56 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Tuma v. Tuma 389 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Tuma v. Tuma 389 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Burt v. Burt 386 N.W.2d 797 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Burt v. Burt 386 N.W.2d 797 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Hattstrom v. Hattstrom 385 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Hattstrom v. Hattstrom 385 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
the court stated: Ruth Servin claims the court erred in not awarding her permanent spousal maintenance.
Nelson v. Nelson 384 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Nelson v. Nelson 384 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Ryan v. Ryan 383 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Ryan v. Ryan 383 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Solberg v. Solberg 382 N.W.2d 859 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Solberg v. Solberg 382 N.W.2d 859 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Nordeen v. Commissioner of Public Safety 382 N.W.2d 256 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Nordeen v. Commissioner of Public Safety 382 N.W.2d 256 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-57 (Minn.1984) (deciding the issue under the prior rule which contained substantially similar language).
Marriage of Guetzkow v. Guetzkow 379 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Guetzkow v. Guetzkow 379 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Balogh v. Balogh 376 N.W.2d 752 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Balogh v. Balogh 376 N.W.2d 752 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Meyer v. Meyer 375 N.W.2d 820 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Meyer v. Meyer 375 N.W.2d 820 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
The court awarded her $800 per month for five years, but “specifically retain[ed] jurisdiction to revise, if necessary, the amount and duration of the maintenance.” because the trial court has specifically reserved this right to review maintenance, we find Margery’s claim premature.
Marriage of Fernandez v. Fernandez 373 N.W.2d 636 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Fernandez v. Fernandez 373 N.W.2d 636 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Ronay v. Ronay 369 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Tucker v. Tucker 368 N.W.2d 335 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Ronay v. Ronay 369 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Tucker v. Tucker 368 N.W.2d 335 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Peterson v. Peterson 367 N.W.2d 90 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Peterson v. Peterson 367 N.W.2d 90 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Burton v. Burton 365 N.W.2d 310 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Burton v. Burton 365 N.W.2d 310 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Midway National Bank of St. Paul v. Ray 359 N.W.2d 644 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Midway National Bank of St. Paul v. Ray 359 N.W.2d 644 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Swanstrom v. Swanstrom 359 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Guetzkow v. Guetzkow 358 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Guetzkow v. Guetzkow 358 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Wiltsey v. Wiltsey 357 N.W.2d 400 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Foster v. Foster 358 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Foster v. Foster 358 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
the Minnesota Supreme Court said: A trial court has broad discretion in dividing marital property upon dissolution of a marriage.
Wiltsey v. Wiltsey 357 N.W.2d 400 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
(the trial court’s decision must be affirmed if it has an acceptable basis in fact and principle).
Marriage of Kaste v. Kaste 356 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Kaste v. Kaste 356 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
ANALYSIS Standard of Review: the Minnesota Supreme Court said: A trial court has broad discretion in dividing marital property upon dissolution of a marriage.
Johns v. Johns 354 N.W.2d 564 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Johns v. Johns 354 N.W.2d 564 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Setter v. Mauritz 351 N.W.2d 396 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Setter v. Mauritz 351 N.W.2d 396 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Swartwoudt v. Swartwoudt 349 N.W.2d 600 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Swartwoudt v. Swartwoudt 349 N.W.2d 600 Minn. Ct. App. 1984