Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Advanced Training Systems Inc. v. Caswell Equipment Co., 352 N.W.2d 1.

53 citing documents.

Karen K. Osowski v. Edie Harer Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Co., n.1 (Minn. 1984); -72 (Minn. 1977).
Jonathan G. Foss v. Mark Scott Savage, Susan Foss, et al., Third Party Defendants Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Nicholas Houchins v. Soo Line Railroad Company d/b/a Canadian Pacific Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Herbert B. Fick v. Eric J. Edwardson, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Paul Allen Bray v. Starbucks Corporation, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Co., (holding that statements made prior to stat ute of limitations period showing willfulness of defendant’s indifference to plaintiff’s rights were admissible).
Poppler v. Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Ass'n 834 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Poppler v. Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Ass'n 834 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Co., -8 (Minn.1984) (remanding for new trial because one of plaintiffs two types of damages was invalid but jury made one award of damages); Morrison Knudsen, 175 F.3d at 1254-55 ; Bone, 774 F.2d at 242-43 .
JEM ACRES, LLC v. Bruno 764 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
JEM ACRES, LLC v. Bruno 764 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Dunn v. National Beverage Corp. 729 N.W.2d 637 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Dunn v. National Beverage Corp. 729 N.W.2d 637 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Co., (discussing statements that are defamatory as matter of law).
Ray v. Miller Meester Advertising, Inc. 664 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Ray v. Miller Meester Advertising, Inc. 664 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Co., Inc., (citation omitted).
Paidar v. Hughes 615 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 2000
Paidar v. Hughes 615 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 2000
Zitzow v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 568 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Zitzow v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 568 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Molenaar v. United Cattle Co. 553 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Molenaar v. United Cattle Co. 553 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Co., (permitting punitive damages for libel); -38 (Minn.1980) (recognizing punitive damages for some wrongful repossessions).
Federal-Hoffman, Inc. v. Fackler 549 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Federal-Hoffman, Inc. v. Fackler 549 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
v. Caswell Equip., (exercising subject matter jurisdiction in a Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act case seeking injunctive relief with respect to allegedly libelous or disparaging material); State by Spannaus v. Century Camera, Inc., (exercising subject matter jurisdiction to determine whether p
Cox v. Crown CoCo, Inc. 544 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Cox v. Crown CoCo, Inc. 544 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Kalia v. St. Cloud State University 539 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Kalia v. St. Cloud State University 539 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Co., Inc., (citing Hammersten v. Reiling, 262 Minn. 200, 208 , , cert.
Carlson v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. 527 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Carlson v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. 527 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
LeDoux v. Northwest Publishing, Inc. 521 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
LeDoux v. Northwest Publishing, Inc. 521 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Plate v. St. Mary's Help of Christians Church 520 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Plate v. St. Mary's Help of Christians Church 520 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Imperial Developers, Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Co. 518 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Imperial Developers, Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Co. 518 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Beck v. American Sharecom, Inc. 514 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Beck v. American Sharecom, Inc. 514 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Co., , 11—12 (Minn.1984) (a motion for a directed verdict should be granted only when the verdict does not comply with law or is manifestly contrary to the evidence).
Meyer v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota 500 N.W.2d 150 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Meyer v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota 500 N.W.2d 150 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Gartenberg 488 N.W.2d 496 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Gartenberg 488 N.W.2d 496 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Stotts v. Wright County 478 N.W.2d 802 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Stotts v. Wright County 478 N.W.2d 802 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Maloney v. Ketter 408 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Maloney v. Ketter 408 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Advanced Training Systems
Proetz v. Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners 382 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Proetz v. Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners 382 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
“Clearly, false or misleading ‘commercial speech’ may be forbidden.”
Frankson v. Design Space International 380 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Frankson v. Design Space International 380 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Cf. Advanced Training Systems, (jury award of $75,000 in actual damages and $250,000 in punitive damages not excessive for libel).
First American National Bank of St. Cloud v. Hommerding 381 N.W.2d 464 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
First American National Bank of St. Cloud v. Hommerding 381 N.W.2d 464 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Rick v. Worden 369 N.W.2d 15 Minn. Ct. App. 1985