Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marty v. Digital Equipment Corp., 345 N.W.2d 773.

26 citing documents.

Raymond R. Holman, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Mary D. Isaacson, Relator v. The Anthem Companies, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Mary D. Isaacson, Relator v. The Anthem Companies, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Corp., review denied (Minn. July 15, 1987).
Bray v. Dogs & Cats Ltd. (1997) 679 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Bray v. Dogs & Cats Ltd. (1997) 679 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. 616 N.W.2d 732 Minn. 2000
Williams v. RIGHT STEP ACADEMY (CORP) 607 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Williams v. RIGHT STEP ACADEMY (CORP) 607 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Corp., (employee may have a right to reject “a job which requires substantially less skill than she possesses,” without losing her right to reemployment insurance benefits); (there may be a demotion if the transfer involves substantiall
Sinykin v. Commissioner of Economic Security 594 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Sinykin v. Commissioner of Economic Security 594 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Corp., (unemployment compensation claimant did not voluntarily resign by refusing to accept new position offered by company, when new position had a lower potential maximum salary, was two grades lower than former position, and chances of advancement were more limited, even though her pay in the new position
Cook v. Playworks 541 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Cook v. Playworks 541 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Corp., (demotion to inferior position with limited opportunities for advancement and pay due to employee's violation of personnel policy regarding romantic relationships constituted good cause for quitting); review denied (Minn. July 1
Dachel v. Ortho Met, Inc. 528 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Dachel v. Ortho Met, Inc. 528 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Corp., (demotion to an inferior position with more limited opportunities for advancement and pay); pet.
Goodwin v. BPS Guard Services, Inc. 524 N.W.2d 28 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Goodwin v. BPS Guard Services, Inc. 524 N.W.2d 28 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Wood v. Menard, Inc. 490 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Wood v. Menard, Inc. 490 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Polley v. Gopher Bearing Co. 478 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Polley v. Gopher Bearing Co. 478 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
a personnel assistant resigned upon being informed that she was being reassigned to a clerical/stenographic position.
Holbrook v. Minnesota Museum of Art 405 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Holbrook v. Minnesota Museum of Art 405 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
a personnel assistant with a maximum potential salary of $10.18 was offered a sales position with a maximum potential salary of $9.30 per hour.
Bestler v. Travel Co. of Minnesota 398 N.W.2d 611 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Bestler v. Travel Co. of Minnesota 398 N.W.2d 611 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
an employee was terminated when she refused to accept a transfer from her position as personnel assistant (at a grade level 10, the top clerical grade with a maximum potential salary of $10.18 per hour) to a sales position (at a grade level 8, with a maximum potential salary of $9.30 per hour).
Simonson v. Thin Film Technology Corp. 392 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Simonson v. Thin Film Technology Corp. 392 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Scott v. The Photo Center, Inc., 306 Minn. 535 , (25 percent reduction in wages); (unilateral 30 percent pay reduction); (change of policy forcing reassignment with reduced grade and wages).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by