Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Schmidt v. Independent School District No. 1, Aitkin, 349 N.W.2d 563.

50 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Proposed Closing of Rollingstone Community School. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
No. 1, a case involving the termination of a teacher, supports the claim that combining the roles of advisor and advocate viol ates due process.
Sleepy Eye Care Center v. Commissioner of Human Services 572 N.W.2d 766 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Sleepy Eye Care Center v. Commissioner of Human Services 572 N.W.2d 766 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
No. 1, -68 (Minn.App.1984).
Teaching License of Falgren v. State, Board of Teaching 545 N.W.2d 901 Minn. 1996
Teaching License of Falgren v. State, Board of Teaching 545 N.W.2d 901 Minn. 1996
In Schmidt v. Independent School District No. 1, the court of appeals held that discharge hearings before the school board will be set aside only if the decision is fraudulent, arbitrary, unreasonable, not supported by substantial evidence on the record, not within the school board’s jurisdiction, or is based on an erroneous theory of law.
In Re the Insurance Agent License of Thomas Casey, Sr., P.A. 540 N.W.2d 854 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Insurance Agent License of Thomas Casey, Sr., P.A. 540 N.W.2d 854 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
No. 1, (determining that grounds for teacher’s termination enunciated by the statute were placed at issue by a notice of termination even though the specific grounds were not expressed separately).
Cloud v. Independent School District No. 38 508 N.W.2d 206 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Cloud v. Independent School District No. 38 508 N.W.2d 206 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
No. 1 Aitkin, Minnesota, -66 (Minn.App.1984).
In Re the Discharge of Peterson 472 N.W.2d 687 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
In Re the Discharge of Peterson 472 N.W.2d 687 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
No. 1, this court concluded that a written notice, by referring to the statute which controls the termination of a teacher’s contract, sufficiently conveyed the grounds for discharge so as to place them at issue in compliance with the statutory procedural requirements.
Minneapolis Police Department v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights 425 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 1988
Minneapolis Police Department v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights 425 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 1988
see also Ganyo v. Independent School District # 832, Schmidt v. Independent School District # 1
In Re the Proposed Discharge of Shelton 408 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Proposed Discharge of Shelton 408 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Schmidt v. Independent School District No. 1
Mpls. Police Dept. v. Mpls. Civ. Rights Com'n 402 N.W.2d 125 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Mpls. Police Dept. v. Mpls. Civ. Rights Com'n 402 N.W.2d 125 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
However, in Schmidt v. Independent School District No. 1, we mandated the employment of a hearing officer, absent unusual or exceptional circumstances.
Minneapolis Police Department v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights 402 N.W.2d 125 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Minneapolis Police Department v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights 402 N.W.2d 125 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
However, in Schmidt v. Independent School District No. 1, we mandated the employment of a hearing officer, absent unusual or exceptional circumstances.
Beste v. Independent School District No. 697 398 N.W.2d 58 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Beste v. Independent School District No. 697 398 N.W.2d 58 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Strand v. Special School District No. 1 392 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 1986
Strand v. Special School District No. 1 392 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 1986
#1, this court by implication indicated its intention that the court of appeals have certiora-ri jurisdiction in these matters.
Roseville Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 623 380 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Roseville Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 623 380 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Schmidt v. Independent School District No. 1, -66 (Minn.Ct.App.1984) (citing Ganyo v. Independent School District No. 832, ).
In Re the Proposed Placement on Unrequested Leave of Absence of Meyer 381 N.W.2d 476 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Proposed Placement on Unrequested Leave of Absence of Meyer 381 N.W.2d 476 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Schmidt v. Independent School District No. 1, (quoting State ex rel.
Bates v. Independent School District No. 482 379 N.W.2d 239 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Bates v. Independent School District No. 482 379 N.W.2d 239 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
At the hearing, the examiner stated he was a lawyer, but conceded he was not among the three types of examiners listed in Schmidt v. Independent School District No. 1
Blank v. Independent School District No. 16 372 N.W.2d 386 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Blank v. Independent School District No. 16 372 N.W.2d 386 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
ANALYSIS A school board’s decision to terminate a teacher may be overturned if the decision was “fraudulent, arbitrary, unreasonable, not supported by substantial evidence on the record, not within the school board's jurisdiction, or is based on an erroneous theory of law.” Schmidt v. Inde *389 pendent School District No. 1
Grinolds v. Independent School District No. 597 366 N.W.2d 667 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Russell v. Special School District No. 6 366 N.W.2d 700 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Grinolds v. Independent School District No. 597 366 N.W.2d 667 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Brandhorst v. Special School District # 1, order of the supreme court in Strand v. Special School District No. 1, (supreme court order denying writ of prohibition); order of the supreme court in Schmidt v. Independent School District No. 1, (supreme court order quashing a writ issued by the district court and granting review before the court of appeals).
Russell v. Special School District No. 6 366 N.W.2d 700 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Ganyo v. Independent School District No. 832, , 499 n. 2 (Minn.1981); Schmidt v. Independent School District *706 No. 1, -68 (Minn.Ct.App.1984).
Pinkney v. Independent School District No. 691 366 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Pinkney v. Independent School District No. 691 366 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Schmidt v. Independent School District No. 1, -68 (Minn.Ct.App.1984); cf. Crosby-Ironton Federation of Teachers v. Independent School District No. 182, (arbitration matter—“due process may be lacking if some applicable code of responsibility is not followed”).
Miller v. City of Saint Paul 363 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Fisher v. Independent School District No. 622 357 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Fisher v. Independent School District No. 622 357 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
No. 1, (citing Ganyo v. Independent School Dist.
Pearson v. School Board of Independent School District No. 381 356 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Freier v. Independent School District No. 197 356 N.W.2d 724 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Pearson v. SCH. BD. OF IND. SCH. DIST. 381 356 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Pearson v. School Board of Independent School District No. 381 356 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Schmidt v. Independent School District No. 1, (quoting Ganyo v. Independent School District No. 832, , 499 n. 2 (Minn.1981)).
Freier v. Independent School District No. 197 356 N.W.2d 724 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Schmidt v. Independent School District No. 1
Pearson v. SCH. BD. OF IND. SCH. DIST. 381 356 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Schmidt v. Independent School District No. 1, (Minn.Ct.App.
Ostlund v. Independent School District No. 47, Sauk Rapids 354 N.W.2d 492 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Ostlund v. Independent School District No. 47, Sauk Rapids 354 N.W.2d 492 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Schmidt v. Independent School District No. 1, Aitkin, Minnesota, -66 (Minn.Ct.App.1984).
Contested Case of Richview Nursing Home v. Minnesota Department of Public Welfare 354 N.W.2d 445 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Contested Case of Richview Nursing Home v. Minnesota Department of Public Welfare 354 N.W.2d 445 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In contrast to Schmidt v. Independent School District No. 1, Aitkin, Minnesota, the risk of bias in this case was not great.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by