Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Letourneau v. Letourneau, 350 N.W.2d 476.
- Marriage of Winter v. Winter 375 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Marriage of Winter v. Winter
375 N.W.2d 76
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In LeTourneau *80 v. LeTourneau, we said: [A]ppellant [should not be] required to commit all her income to her needs and the needs of the parties’ child while the respondent is required to account only for the deficiency irrespective of his income.
- Sefkow v. Sefkow 372 N.W.2d 37 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Sefkow v. Sefkow 372 N.W.2d 37 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Marriage of Riley v. Riley 369 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Marriage of Riley v. Riley
369 N.W.2d 40
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
The legislature has determined “that children are entitled to benefit from the income of the non-custodial parent and to enjoy the standard of living that they would have had if the marriage had not been dissolved.”
- Marriage of Goar v. Goar 368 N.W.2d 348 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Marriage of Goar v. Goar 368 N.W.2d 348 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Marriage of Hortis v. Hortis 367 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Marriage of Hortis v. Hortis
367 N.W.2d 633
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
: [The statutory guidelines] clearly reflect a legislative determination that children are entitled to benefit from the income of the non-custodial parent and to enjoy the standard of living that they would have had if the marriage had not been dissolved.
- Marriage of Linderman v. Linderman 364 N.W.2d 872 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Marriage of Linderman v. Linderman 364 N.W.2d 872 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State Ex Rel. Southwell v. Chamberland 361 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 1985
- State Ex Rel. Southwell v. Chamberland 361 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 1985
- Lee v. Ystebo 353 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Lee v. Ystebo 353 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1984