Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Waller v. Powers Department Store, 343 N.W.2d 655.

38 citing documents.

Hibbing Taconite Company, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“[I]f nothing more than a broad grant of authority were needed to show that implied authority could be fairly drawn from the statutory scheme, the implied authority would be present in all cases in which the agency had a broad grant of authority.” Qwest, d at 261; see also Waller v. Powers Dep’t Store, (“Neither agencies nor courts may under the guise of statutory interpretation enlarge the agency’s powers beyond that which was contemplated by the legislative body.”).
In re the Matter of St. Paul Area Electrical JATC Registered Apprenticeship Program and Damon Doss. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
” Waller v. Powers Dep’t Store
Malloy v. Commissioner of Human Services 657 N.W.2d 894 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Malloy v. Commissioner of Human Services 657 N.W.2d 894 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
“Neither agencies nor courts may under the guise of statutory interpretation enlarge the agency’s powers beyond that which was contemplated by the legislative body.” Waller v. Powers Dep’t Store, (citation omitted).
Haghighi v. Russian-American Broadcasting Co. 577 N.W.2d 927 Minn. 1998
Haghighi v. Russian-American Broadcasting Co. 577 N.W.2d 927 Minn. 1998
6 . Olson v.Olson, Feick v. State Farm Mut.
Matter of Rate Appeals of Lyngblomsten Care Center 578 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Matter of Rate Appeals of Lyngblomsten Care Center 578 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
more than one reasonable interpretation and court must apply rules of construction); Waller v. Powers Dep’t. Store, (statutory construction appropriate only when statute is ambiguous).
Mankato Free Press Co. v. City of North Mankato 563 N.W.2d 291 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Mankato Free Press Co. v. City of North Mankato 563 N.W.2d 291 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Sec., (statute is ambiguous if it has more than one reasonable interpretation and court must apply rules of construction); Waller v. Powers Dep’t Store, (statutory *294 construction appropriate only when statute is ambiguous).
Matter of Black 522 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Matter of Black 522 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
See Waller v. Powers Dep’t Store
Minnesota Teamsters Public & Law Enforcement Employee's Union, Local No. 320, Minneapolis v. County of McLeod 509 N.W.2d 554 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Minnesota Teamsters Public & Law Enforcement Employee's Union, Local No. 320, Minneapolis v. County of McLeod 509 N.W.2d 554 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Waller v. Powers Dep’t Store, (citations omitted).
Surf and Sand, Inc. v. Gardebring 457 N.W.2d 782 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Surf and Sand, Inc. v. Gardebring 457 N.W.2d 782 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
In re an Investigation of Unfair Election Practice Objections 451 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
In re an Investigation of Unfair Election Practice Objections 451 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Petition of Minnesota Power & Light Co. 435 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Petition of Minnesota Power & Light Co. 435 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
“Neither agencies nor courts may under the guise of statutory interpretation enlarge the agency’s powers beyond that which was contemplated by the legislative body.”
In Re De Laria Transport, Inc. 427 N.W.2d 745 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In Re De Laria Transport, Inc. 427 N.W.2d 745 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
“Neither agencies nor courts may under the guise of statutory interpretation enlarge the agency’s powers beyond that which was contemplated by the legislative body.”
In Re the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission's Initiation of Summary Investigation 417 N.W.2d 274 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Distinguished In Re the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission's Initiation of Summary Investigation 417 N.W.2d 274 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Ellingson & Associates, Inc. v. Keefe 396 N.W.2d 694 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Ellingson & Associates, Inc. v. Keefe 396 N.W.2d 694 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
“[A] writ of prohibition is the appropriate form of relief when a court has exceeded its power to order discovery.” (emphasis added); Mampel v. Eastern Heights State Bank of St.
Handle With Care, Inc. v. Department of Human Services 393 N.W.2d 421 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Handle With Care, Inc. v. Department of Human Services 393 N.W.2d 421 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 392 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 392 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Termination of the Coaching Contract of Hahn Ex Rel. Independent School District No. 378 386 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Termination of the Coaching Contract of Hahn Ex Rel. Independent School District No. 378 386 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re Wage & Hour Violations of Holly Inn, Inc. 386 N.W.2d 305 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re Wage & Hour Violations of Holly Inn, Inc. 386 N.W.2d 305 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Nelson v. Ninneman 373 N.W.2d 373 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Nelson v. Ninneman 373 N.W.2d 373 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 369 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1985
Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 369 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1985
“Neither agencies nor courts may under the guise of statutory interpretation enlarge the agency’s powers beyond that which was contemplated by the legislative body.”