Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Matter of Discipline of Rockne, 375 N.W.2d 28.
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Samborski 644 N.W.2d 402 Minn. 2002
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Samborski 644 N.W.2d 402 Minn. 2002
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Muenchrath 588 N.W.2d 497 Minn. 1999
-
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Muenchrath
588 N.W.2d 497
Minn. 1999
See, e.g., Bishop, d at 261 ; and
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Bishop 582 N.W.2d 261 Minn. 1998
-
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Bishop
582 N.W.2d 261
Minn. 1998
“[Sanctions will be imposed on those attorneys who, after careful investigation, proper notice, and hearing, are found to have demonstrated that they do not possess the qualities of character and the professional competence requisite to the practice of law.” (internal quotations omitted).
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Merlin 572 N.W.2d 737 Minn. 1998
-
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Merlin
572 N.W.2d 737
Minn. 1998
(indefinite suspension for neglect of two client matters, practicing law while suspended for failure to pay attorney registration fee, and noneooperation during the disciplinary investigation); (indefinite suspension for neglect of client matters, failure to return client phone calls, and noncooperation during the disciplinary investigation); (indefinite suspension for failure to pursue a client’s claim or return the client’s calls and noncooperation during the disciplinary investigation).
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Anderson 569 N.W.2d 923 Minn. 1997
-
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Anderson
569 N.W.2d 923
Minn. 1997
His conduct gives us no choice but to order his indefinite suspension * *
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Kinnunen 502 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 1993
-
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Kinnunen
502 N.W.2d 773
Minn. 1993
(indefinite suspension ordered for attorney who failed to act on client’s claim, return client’s calls, or surrender client’s documents upon request, and who failed to cooperate in disciplinary proceedings); (attorney who neglected two cases, failed to communicate
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Walker 461 N.W.2d 219 Minn. 1990
-
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Walker
461 N.W.2d 219
Minn. 1990
The court imposed indefinite suspension on an attorney whose misconduct was noncooperation and neglect of one client matter in
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Pokorny 453 N.W.2d 345 Minn. 1990
-
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Pokorny
453 N.W.2d 345
Minn. 1990
Undoubtedly, such conduct should be discouraged because it indicates indifference not only to clients, “but to the officials charged with policing the profession and this court.”
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Madsen 426 N.W.2d 434 Minn. 1988
-
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Madsen
426 N.W.2d 434
Minn. 1988
In support of his recommendation, the director seeks to establish an analogy between the present case and the facts in the following cases where this court ordered indefinite suspension:
- MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF McCOY 422 N.W.2d 731 Minn. 1988
-
MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF McCOY
422 N.W.2d 731
Minn. 1988
We have carefully reviewed the nature of the misconduct and considered the cumulative weight of the violations of disciplinary rules and of the terms of probation, the harm to the public, and the harm to the legal profession, and we conclude that we have no choice except to order suspension.
- In Re the Disciplinary Action Against Jensen 418 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 1988
- In Re the Disciplinary Action Against Jensen 418 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 1988
- In re the Discipline of Thompson 407 N.W.2d 676 Minn. 1987
- In re the Discipline of Thompson 407 N.W.2d 676 Minn. 1987
- Matter of Discipline of Moore 387 N.W.2d 435 Minn. 1986
- Matter of Discipline of Moore 387 N.W.2d 435 Minn. 1986