Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Appelgate v. Commissioner of Public Safety, 402 N.W.2d 106.

101 citing documents.

State v. Syhavong 661 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Syhavong 661 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Dalos 635 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Dalos 635 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Safety, (citation omitted).
State v. Tomaino 627 N.W.2d 338 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Tomaino 627 N.W.2d 338 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Hanson 501 N.W.2d 677 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Hanson 501 N.W.2d 677 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Safety, (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417-18 , 101 S.Ct.
Carradine v. State 494 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Carradine v. State 494 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Safety, (a limited investigative stop is lawful if the officer can articulate a particularized and objective basis for suspecting criminal activity).
State v. Bellikka 490 N.W.2d 660 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Bellikka 490 N.W.2d 660 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Safety, a police officer responded to a 2:25 a.m.
State v. Saffeels 484 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Saffeels 484 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Pahlen v. Commissioner of Public Safety 482 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Pahlen v. Commissioner of Public Safety 482 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
City of St. Paul v. Uber 450 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
City of St. Paul v. Uber 450 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
wherein Applegate's vehicle was stopped by police in the area of a recently reported burglary after the officer observed his vehicle coming from the apartment complex where the burglarized apartment was located, just a few minutes after the burglary, in an area of very limited traffic.
State v. Moffatt 450 N.W.2d 116 Minn. 1990
State v. Moffatt 450 N.W.2d 116 Minn. 1990
Safety, where we upheld a “freeze the situation” stop just like the one in this case under similar circumstances (stop of only car in area moments after report of burglary).
Johnson v. Morris 445 N.W.2d 563 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Johnson v. Morris 445 N.W.2d 563 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
690, 695-96 , 66 L.Ed.2d 621 (1981)
State v. Sorenson 441 N.W.2d 455 Minn. 1989
State v. Sorenson 441 N.W.2d 455 Minn. 1989
Safety, (quoting Cortez, 449 U.S. at 417-18 , 101 S.Ct.
State v. Sorenson 430 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Wold v. State 430 N.W.2d 171 Minn. 1988
Wold v. State 430 N.W.2d 171 Minn. 1988
Schwartz v. Commissioner of Public Safety 422 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Schwartz v. Commissioner of Public Safety 422 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Lipinski 419 N.W.2d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Lipinski 419 N.W.2d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Certainly a doctor of an institution like that is going to understand whether or not a person was under the influence.” (relevant circumstances include “information the officer has received from other sources, the nature of the offense suspected, and the location”).
State v. Rean 416 N.W.2d 790 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Rean 416 N.W.2d 790 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Seemann v. Little Crow Trucking 412 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Seemann v. Little Crow Trucking 412 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(court relied upon a finding made in trial court’s memorandum).
State v. Berger 412 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Olmscheid v. Commissioner of Public Safety 412 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Olmscheid v. Commissioner of Public Safety 412 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Berger 412 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
A limited investigative stop is lawful if the officer is able to articulate at the judicial hearing on the validity of the stop that he had a “particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.” *19 (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417-18 , 101 S.Ct.
Purnell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 410 N.W.2d 439 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Purnell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 410 N.W.2d 439 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
We disagree, controlling.
Norman v. Commissioner of Public Safety 409 N.W.2d 544 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Norman v. Commissioner of Public Safety 409 N.W.2d 544 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
“These circumstances include the officer’s general knowledge and experience, the officer’s personal observations, information the officer has received from other sources, the nature of the offense suspected, the time, the location, and anything else that is relevant.”
Kotewa v. Commissioner of Public Safety 409 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Kotewa v. Commissioner of Public Safety 409 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The totality of circumstances includes “the officer’s general knowledge and experience, the officer’s personal observations, information the officer has received from other sources, the nature of the offense suspected, the time, the location, and anything else that is relevant.”
Young v. Commissioner of Public Safety 408 N.W.2d 212 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Young v. Commissioner of Public Safety 408 N.W.2d 212 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Payne 406 N.W.2d 511 Minn. 1987
State v. Payne 406 N.W.2d 511 Minn. 1987
(stop of car at 2:30 a.m.
Daly v. Commissioner of Public Safety 405 N.W.2d 489 Minn. Ct. App. 1987