Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Castor v. City of Minneapolis, 429 N.W.2d 244.

29 citing documents.

Steven Bystedt, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See Castor v. City of Minneapolis , (finding the “unusu al structure” of the public skyway, running the length of petitioner’s building “rather than simply across the alley,” four-to- five feet away from petitioner’s building and adjacent to petitioner’s second-story windows, constituted an improper street use entitling petitioners
RK Midway, LLC v. Metropolitan Council Minn. Ct. App. 2017
RK Midway, LLC v. Metropolitan Council Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Breza v. City of Minnetrista 725 N.W.2d 106 Minn. 2006
Breza v. City of Minnetrista 725 N.W.2d 106 Minn. 2006
Allen v. City of Mendota Heights 694 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Allen v. City of Mendota Heights 694 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Manco of Fairmont, Inc. v. Town Board of Rock Dell Township 583 N.W.2d 293 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Manco of Fairmont, Inc. v. Town Board of Rock Dell Township 583 N.W.2d 293 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Raen v. Renville County Bd.
Miller-Lagro v. Northern States Power Co. 582 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 1998
Miller-Lagro v. Northern States Power Co. 582 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 1998
See, Schwermann v. Reinhart, 296 Minn. 340, 342 , Dexner v. Houghton, 153 Minn. 284, 289 , 190 N.W.
Grossman Investments v. State Ex Rel. Humphrey 571 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Grossman Investments v. State Ex Rel. Humphrey 571 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
The second line of cases, while acknowledging the existence of implied easements for light, air, and view, compensates property owners only for interference with those easements from “improper street uses.” -46 (Minn.1988); Haeussler, d at 8 .
Neal v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. 529 N.W.2d 330 Minn. 1995
Neal v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. 529 N.W.2d 330 Minn. 1995
Behrens v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 520 N.W.2d 763 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Behrens v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 520 N.W.2d 763 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Neal v. State Farm Insurance Co. 509 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Neal v. State Farm Insurance Co. 509 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Castor v. City of Minne *176 apolis
ARATEX SERVICES, INC. v. Blue Horse, Inc. 497 N.W.2d 283 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
ARATEX SERVICES, INC. v. Blue Horse, Inc. 497 N.W.2d 283 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Harvey 474 N.W.2d 189 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Harvey 474 N.W.2d 189 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Ortega v. Farmers Insurance Group 474 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Ortega v. Farmers Insurance Group 474 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Principal Financial Group v. Allstate Insurance Co. 472 N.W.2d 338 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Principal Financial Group v. Allstate Insurance Co. 472 N.W.2d 338 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Rose Cliff Landscape Nursery, Inc. v. City of Rosemount 467 N.W.2d 641 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Rose Cliff Landscape Nursery, Inc. v. City of Rosemount 467 N.W.2d 641 Minn. Ct. App. 1991