Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Maranda v. Maranda, 449 N.W.2d 158.
- In re C.M.A. 557 N.W.2d 353 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
- In Re CMA 557 N.W.2d 353 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
- Shirk v. Shirk 551 N.W.2d 504 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
-
Shirk v. Shirk
551 N.W.2d 504
Minn. Ct. App. 1996
2 (upholding vacation of stipulation for fraud on the court in part because of “considerable doubt” about counsel’s competency).
- Marriage of Kornberg v. Kornberg 542 N.W.2d 379 Minn. 1996
-
Marriage of Kornberg v. Kornberg
542 N.W.2d 379
Minn. 1996
Anderson v. Anderson, 303 Minn. 26
- Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson 533 N.W.2d 859 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-
Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson
533 N.W.2d 859
Minn. Ct. App. 1995
The record here is not sufficient to show that DuWayne “engaged in an unconscionable scheme or plan to influence the court improperly.”
- Marriage of Kornberg v. Kornberg 525 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- Marriage of Kornberg v. Kornberg 525 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- Kriesel v. Gustafson 513 N.W.2d 9 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-
Kriesel v. Gustafson
513 N.W.2d 9
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
2(d) (1992); (judgment and decree cannot be vacated more than one year after the entry of judgment unless basis for reopening is fraud on the court).
- Peterson v. Eishen 512 N.W.2d 338 Minn. 1994
- Peterson v. Eishen 512 N.W.2d 338 Minn. 1994
- Marriage of Sanborn v. Sanborn 503 N.W.2d 499 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-
Marriage of Sanborn v. Sanborn
503 N.W.2d 499
Minn. Ct. App. 1993
(trial court has discretion to vacate a stipulation for fraud on the court).
- Marriage of Peterson v. Eishen 495 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- Marriage of Peterson v. Eishen 495 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- Marriage of Mahoney v. Mahoney 474 N.W.2d 232 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Marriage of Mahoney v. Mahoney 474 N.W.2d 232 Minn. Ct. App. 1991