Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Maxfield v. Maxfield, 452 N.W.2d 219.

83 citing documents.

Marriage of Guyer v. Guyer 587 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Marriage of Schubel v. Schubel 584 N.W.2d 434 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Marriage of Schubel v. Schubel 584 N.W.2d 434 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Morrison v. Doyle 570 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Morrison v. Doyle 570 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
review denied (Minn. Mar.
Kroning v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. 567 N.W.2d 42 Minn. 1997
Kroning v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. 567 N.W.2d 42 Minn. 1997
(noting that the trial court is in the best position to judge credibility of witnesses).
In Re Medworth 562 N.W.2d 522 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
In Re Medworth 562 N.W.2d 522 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Rehn v. Fischley 557 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1997
Rehn v. Fischley 557 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1997
Kepler v. Kordel, Inc. 542 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Kepler v. Kordel, Inc. 542 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
As to the trial court’s conclusions on the ultimate issues, mindful of the discretion accorded the trial court in the exercise of its equitable jurisdiction, the reviewing court reviews under an abuse of discretion standard.”
In Re the Welfare of M.P. 542 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Welfare of M.P. 542 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
(stating “the golden thread running through any best interests analysis is the importance * * * of [a child’s] bond with the primary parent”); Minn.Stat.
Marriage of Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld 529 N.W.2d 724 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Marriage of Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld 529 N.W.2d 724 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Holmberg v. Holmberg 529 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Holmberg v. Holmberg 529 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Jensen v. Hercules, Inc. 524 N.W.2d 748 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Jensen v. Hercules, Inc. 524 N.W.2d 748 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
(where the trial court is weighing statutory criteria in light of the found basic facts, the trial court’s conclusions will include a determination of mixed questions of law and fact).
In Re the Welfare of T.P. 492 N.W.2d 267 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In Re the Welfare of T.P. 492 N.W.2d 267 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In Re the Welfare of D.L. 479 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In Re the Welfare of D.L. 479 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
(child’s bond with the primary parent should not be disrupted without strong reasons).
Marriage of Ross v. Ross 477 N.W.2d 753 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Ross v. Ross 477 N.W.2d 753 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Gibson v. Gibson 471 N.W.2d 384 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Gibson v. Gibson 471 N.W.2d 384 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
In Re the Custody of M.A.L. 457 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
In Re the Custody of M.A.L. 457 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
(a young child’s bond with a primary caretaker bears on other statutory criteria).
In Re the Welfare of M.M. 452 N.W.2d 236 Minn. 1990
In Re the Welfare of M.M. 452 N.W.2d 236 Minn. 1990
(citations omitted).- Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the district court transferring the guardianship and legal custody of M.M.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by