Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Olson, 436 N.W.2d 92.
- State v. Moorman 505 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1993
-
State v. Moorman
505 N.W.2d 593
Minn. 1993
aff'd, 495 U.S. 91 , 110 S.Ct.
- State v. Hummel 483 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 1992
-
State v. Hummel
483 N.W.2d 68
Minn. 1992
“[T]he Dorman factors are part of a flexible approach that encompasses all relevant circumstances.” aff 'd, 495 U.S. 91 , 110 S.Ct.
- State v. Gray 456 N.W.2d 251 Minn. 1990
-
State v. Gray
456 N.W.2d 251
Minn. 1990
This preference is the strongest when a dwelling is involved, since “to be protected from warrantless, nonconsensual intrusion into the privacy of one’s dwelling is an important fourth amendment right.” -97 (Minn.1989), aff'd, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct.