Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Moore, 438 N.W.2d 101.
- State v. DeShay 645 N.W.2d 185 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- State v. Bauer 642 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- State v. Bauer 642 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- State v. Lewis 638 N.W.2d 788 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- State v. Lewis 638 N.W.2d 788 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- State v. James 638 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- State v. James 638 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- State v. Hendry 636 N.W.2d 158 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Hendry 636 N.W.2d 158 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Tze Thao 634 N.W.2d 245 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Tze Thao 634 N.W.2d 245 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. McDonough 631 N.W.2d 373 Minn. 2001
- State v. McDonough 631 N.W.2d 373 Minn. 2001
- State v. Yang 627 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
-
State v. Yang
627 N.W.2d 666
Minn. Ct. App. 2001
The reviewing court must assume “the jury believed the state’s witnesses and disbelieved any evidence to the contrary.”
- State v. Carillo 623 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Carillo 623 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Greenfield 622 N.W.2d 403 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Greenfield 622 N.W.2d 403 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Woelfel 621 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Woelfel 621 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Bakken 604 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-
State v. Bakken
604 N.W.2d 106
Minn. Ct. App. 2000
A reviewing court must assume “the jury believed the state’s witnesses and disbelieved any evidence to the contrary.”
- State v. Clow 600 N.W.2d 724 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
State v. Clow
600 N.W.2d 724
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
The reviewing court must assume that “the jury believed the state’s witnesses and disbelieved any evidence to the contrary.” (citation omitted).
- State v. Schneider 597 N.W.2d 889 Minn. 1999
-
State v. Schneider
597 N.W.2d 889
Minn. 1999
This court conducts that review “assuming the jury believed the state’s witnesses and disbelieved any evidence to the contrary.”
- State v. Chuon 596 N.W.2d 267 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- State v. Chuon 596 N.W.2d 267 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- State v. Wilson 594 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
State v. Wilson
594 N.W.2d 268
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(reviewing court assumes the fact-finder “believed the state’s witnesses and disbelieved any evidence to the contrary”) (citation omitted).
- State v. Greenleaf 591 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1999
- State v. DeVerney 592 N.W.2d 837 Minn. 1999
-
State v. Greenleaf
591 N.W.2d 488
Minn. 1999
-05 (Minn.1989) (stating that a prosecutor’s failure to disclose exculpatory evidence to the grand jury will require dismissal of the indictment if the evidence would have materially affected the grand jury proceeding).
- State v. DeVerney 592 N.W.2d 837 Minn. 1999
- State v. Profit 591 N.W.2d 451 Minn. 1999
- State v. Profit 591 N.W.2d 451 Minn. 1999
- State v. Lynch 590 N.W.2d 75 Minn. 1999
- State v. Lynch 590 N.W.2d 75 Minn. 1999
- State v. Harris 589 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 1999
-
State v. Harris
589 N.W.2d 782
Minn. 1999
' In so doing, we assume that “the jury believed the state’s witnesses and disbelieved any evidence to the contrary.”
- State v. Hough 585 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1998
- State v. Hough 585 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1998
- State v. Miles 585 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1998
- State v. Miles 585 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1998
- State v. Occhino 572 N.W.2d 316 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
-
State v. Occhino
572 N.W.2d 316
Minn. Ct. App. 1997
We must assume that “the jury believed the state’s witnesses and disbelieved any evidence to the contrary.”
- State v. Folkers 562 N.W.2d 5 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
- State v. Folkers 562 N.W.2d 5 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
- Cooper v. State 565 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1997