Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Brom, 463 N.W.2d 758.

80 citing documents.

  • State v. Couture 587 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • State v. Couture 587 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • State v. Griese 565 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1997
  • State v. Griese 565 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1997
    Like intent, premeditation is “‘subjective’ and must be inferred from ‘the totality of the circumstances surrounding the crime.’ ” (citations omitted), cert.
  • State v. Schreiber 558 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1997
  • State v. Schreiber 558 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1997
    -64 (Minn.1990), cert, denied, 499 U.S. 940 , 111 S.Ct.
  • State v. Smith 541 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 1996
  • State v. Smith 541 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 1996
  • State v. Wilson 539 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 1995
  • State v. Wilson 539 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 1995
  • State v. Chao Yang 533 N.W.2d 81 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • State v. Roan 532 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1995
  • State v. Roan 532 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1995
    1 (1994); cert, denied, 499 U.S. 940 , 111 S.Ct.
  • State v. Ouk 516 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1994
  • State v. Ouk 516 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1994
  • State v. Lee 491 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1992
  • State v. Lee 491 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1992
  • State v. Provost 490 N.W.2d 93 Minn. 1992
  • State v. Provost 490 N.W.2d 93 Minn. 1992
    -68 (Minn.1990) (Wahl, J., dissenting) (citing sources that one in three adults in the United States reported that they or a family member sought help from a psychiatrist or psychologist at some time in their lives), cert, denied, Brom v. Minnesota, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct.
  • State v. Miller 488 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 1992
  • State v. Miller 488 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 1992
    “Whether to impose concurrent or consecutive multiple life sentences for first degree murder falls *241 within the discretion of the trial court.” (citations omitted).
  • State v. Jobe 486 N.W.2d 407 Minn. 1992
  • State v. Jobe 486 N.W.2d 407 Minn. 1992
    1 (1990); Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines II.F.; cert.
  • Hill v. State 483 N.W.2d 57 Minn. 1992
  • State v. Allen 482 N.W.2d 228 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
  • State v. Allen 482 N.W.2d 228 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
    Allen argues that the supreme court’s cert.
  • State v. Elting 480 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
  • State v. Elting 480 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
  • State v. Barsness 473 N.W.2d 325 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Barsness 473 N.W.2d 325 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
    Since the pretrial appeal, the supreme court has reaffirmed Bouwman while noting that the “behavioral manifestations of mental impairment”— as opposed to psychiatric labeling of it — is “capable of lay understanding.” , 763 n. 9 (Minn.1990), ce rt.