Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Brom, 463 N.W.2d 758.
- State v. Couture 587 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- State v. Couture 587 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- State v. Griese 565 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1997
-
State v. Griese
565 N.W.2d 419
Minn. 1997
Like intent, premeditation is “‘subjective’ and must be inferred from ‘the totality of the circumstances surrounding the crime.’ ” (citations omitted), cert.
- State v. Schreiber 558 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1997
-
State v. Schreiber
558 N.W.2d 474
Minn. 1997
-64 (Minn.1990), cert, denied, 499 U.S. 940 , 111 S.Ct.
- State v. Smith 541 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 1996
- State v. Smith 541 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 1996
- State v. Wilson 539 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 1995
- State v. Wilson 539 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 1995
- State v. Chao Yang 533 N.W.2d 81 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- State v. Roan 532 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1995
-
State v. Roan
532 N.W.2d 563
Minn. 1995
1 (1994); cert, denied, 499 U.S. 940 , 111 S.Ct.
- State v. Ouk 516 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1994
- State v. Ouk 516 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1994
- State v. Lee 491 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1992
- State v. Lee 491 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1992
- State v. Provost 490 N.W.2d 93 Minn. 1992
-
State v. Provost
490 N.W.2d 93
Minn. 1992
-68 (Minn.1990) (Wahl, J., dissenting) (citing sources that one in three adults in the United States reported that they or a family member sought help from a psychiatrist or psychologist at some time in their lives), cert, denied, Brom v. Minnesota, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct.
- State v. Miller 488 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 1992
-
State v. Miller
488 N.W.2d 235
Minn. 1992
“Whether to impose concurrent or consecutive multiple life sentences for first degree murder falls *241 within the discretion of the trial court.” (citations omitted).
- State v. Jobe 486 N.W.2d 407 Minn. 1992
-
State v. Jobe
486 N.W.2d 407
Minn. 1992
1 (1990); Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines II.F.; cert.
- Hill v. State 483 N.W.2d 57 Minn. 1992
- State v. Allen 482 N.W.2d 228 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
-
State v. Allen
482 N.W.2d 228
Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Allen argues that the supreme court’s cert.
- State v. Elting 480 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- State v. Elting 480 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- State v. Barsness 473 N.W.2d 325 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
-
State v. Barsness
473 N.W.2d 325
Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Since the pretrial appeal, the supreme court has reaffirmed Bouwman while noting that the “behavioral manifestations of mental impairment”— as opposed to psychiatric labeling of it — is “capable of lay understanding.” , 763 n. 9 (Minn.1990), ce rt.