Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Best, 449 N.W.2d 426.
- State v. Simmons 646 N.W.2d 564 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- State v. Simmons 646 N.W.2d 564 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- State v. Traylor 641 N.W.2d 335 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- State v. Traylor 641 N.W.2d 335 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- State v. McCoy 631 N.W.2d 446 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
-
State v. McCoy
631 N.W.2d 446
Minn. Ct. App. 2001
A sentencing court “has broad discretion to depart only if aggravating or mitigating circumstances are present.”
- State v. Valentine 630 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Valentine 630 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Reece 625 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 2001
- State v. Reece 625 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 2001
- State v. Morris 609 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-
State v. Morris
609 N.W.2d 242
Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Guidelines II.D; (trial court has discretion to depart from presumptive sentence only if aggravating or mitigating circumstances are present).
- State v. Jackson 596 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
State v. Jackson
596 N.W.2d 262
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Although the trial court generally applies the presumptive sentence, the court has discretion to depart when the offense involves “aggravating or mitigating circumstances.”
- State v. Spain 590 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1999
- State v. Spain 590 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1999
- State v. Folkers 581 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 1998
- State v. Folkers 581 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 1998
- State v. Collins 580 N.W.2d 36 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
-
State v. Collins
580 N.W.2d 36
Minn. Ct. App. 1998
B. Grounds for departure A court may depart upward from the presumptive sentence “only if aggravating * * * circumstances are present.” State u Best
- State v. Behl 573 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
- State v. Behl 573 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
- State v. Thoma 569 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
-
State v. Thoma
569 N.W.2d 205
Minn. Ct. App. 1997
(court has broad discretion to depart if aggravating or mitigating circumstances are present); cf. Krotzer, d at 254 (describing stay of adjudications as “unusual judicial measures”).
- State v. Murphy 545 N.W.2d 909 Minn. 1996
- State v. Murphy 545 N.W.2d 909 Minn. 1996
- State v. Givens 544 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1996
- State v. Givens 544 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1996
- State v. Bauerly 520 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- State v. Bauerly 520 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- State v. Anderson 520 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- State v. Anderson 520 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- State v. Harwell 515 N.W.2d 105 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- State v. Harwell 515 N.W.2d 105 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- State v. Patterson 511 N.W.2d 476 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- State v. Patterson 511 N.W.2d 476 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- State v. Halvorson 506 N.W.2d 331 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- State v. Halvorson 506 N.W.2d 331 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- State v. Rodriguez 505 N.W.2d 373 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- State v. Rodriguez 505 N.W.2d 373 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- State v. Lonergan 505 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- State v. Lonergan 505 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- State v. Douglas 501 N.W.2d 694 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- State v. Kimmons 502 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- State v. Douglas 501 N.W.2d 694 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- State v. Kimmons 502 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- State v. Lee 494 N.W.2d 475 Minn. 1993
- State v. Dokken 487 N.W.2d 914 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- State v. Dokken 487 N.W.2d 914 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- State v. Bock 490 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1992