Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Investigation & Determination of an Appropriate Unit & Exclusive Representative Hill-Murr…, 487 N.W.2d 857.
-
Lundman v. McKown
530 N.W.2d 807
Minn. Ct. App. 1995
See Hill-Murray Fed’n (retaining compelling state interest balancing test).
- Geraci v. Eckankar 526 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- Geraci v. Eckankar 526 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- Rasmussen v. Glass 498 N.W.2d 508 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-
Rasmussen v. Glass
498 N.W.2d 508
Minn. Ct. App. 1993
To resolve this issue, we apply the four-part test referred to in Hill-Murray Fed’n