Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Turner v. IDS Financial Services, Inc., 471 N.W.2d 105.

26 citing documents.

Shields Law Group, LLC, Spencer Shields v. Gustafson Gluek PLLC, Watts ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Shields Law Group, LLC, Spencer Shields v. Gustafson Gluek PLLC, Watts ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Mark J. Kallenbach, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Servs., Inc., d 105, 108 (Minn. 1991) (addressing accrual of employment-discrimination claim and recognizing that “a tort action accrues when some damages are sustained”); Antone, d at 336 (addressing accrual of legal- malpractice claim and stating that “a cause of action accrues, and the statute of limitations begins to run
Meagan Abel, Minn. 2020
Meagan Abel, Appellant, vs. Abbott Northwestern Hospital, et al., Respondents, St. Mary's University Minnesota, Respondent. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Servs., Inc., (holding that statute of limitations runs from the time of notice of termination).
A Xiong, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Servs., Inc. , which held that, in an employment-discrimination claim, the triggering event for the statute of limitations is when notice of termination is communicated to the employee.
Ford v. Minneapolis Public Schools 845 N.W.2d 566 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Ford v. Minneapolis Public Schools 845 N.W.2d 566 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Servs., Inc., the supreme court held that the statute of limitations for a claim under the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA) begins running when “an unequivocal, unconditional notice of termination is given.” • The statute of limitations in the MHRA required an action to be commenced “within 300 days after the occ
Kmart Corp. v. County of Stearns 710 N.W.2d 761 Minn. 2006
Kmart Corp. v. County of Stearns 710 N.W.2d 761 Minn. 2006
Ray v. Miller Meester Advertising, Inc. 684 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 2004
Ray v. Miller Meester Advertising, Inc. 684 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 2004
State v. Baird 654 N.W.2d 105 Minn. 2002
State v. Baird 654 N.W.2d 105 Minn. 2002
Servs., Inc., -09 (Minn.1991) (citing Olsen, d at 907 n. 15, and Nieting v. Blondell, 306 Minn. 122 , ).
Marriage of Holmberg v. Holmberg 588 N.W.2d 720 Minn. 1999
Marriage of Holmberg v. Holmberg 588 N.W.2d 720 Minn. 1999
Diez v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing 564 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Diez v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing 564 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Servs., Inc., the supreme court explained that when construing the phrase “occurrence of the practice,” courts should examine “the discriminatory act rather than when the consequences of that act become most painful.” Id.
State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. RSJ, Inc. 552 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 1996
State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. RSJ, Inc. 552 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 1996
Servs., Inc., (new rule of law generally applied to case before the court and to claims arising after the date of overruling decision).
State v. Sims 553 N.W.2d 58 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Sims 553 N.W.2d 58 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
(prospective only application of recording requirement); (prospective only application of sentencing rules); see also Turner v. IDS Financial Servs., Inc., (court’s rulings are purely prospective only in very limited situations).
Anderson v. Northwestern National Life Insurance Co. 480 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Anderson v. Northwestern National Life Insurance Co. 480 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
City of Lake Elmo v. Minnesota Municipal Board 474 N.W.2d 450 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
City of Lake Elmo v. Minnesota Municipal Board 474 N.W.2d 450 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
See Turner v. IDS Financial Servs., Inc., (illegal act occurs when notice of termination is given, not when termination becomes effective).