Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Edwards, 485 N.W.2d 911.
- State v. Hollander 590 N.W.2d 341 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- State v. Griller 583 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 1998
- State v. Griller 583 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 1998
- State v. Ferguson 581 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1998
- State v. Ferguson 581 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1998
- State v. Wallace 558 N.W.2d 469 Minn. 1997
-
State v. Wallace
558 N.W.2d 469
Minn. 1997
803(2); 914 (Minn.1992) (overruling, as an abuse of discretion, the exclusion of excited utterances to a 911 operator by a mother and daughter that the daughter had been sexually abused); that the evidence was sufficient without the forensic testing now demanded by appellant; that, on the limited record before us, couns
- State v. Salazar 504 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1993
- State v. Salazar 504 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1993
- State v. Goldenstein 505 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-
State v. Goldenstein
505 N.W.2d 332
Minn. Ct. App. 1993
(citing Wright, 497 U.S. at 819 , 110 S.Ct.
- State v. Scott 501 N.W.2d 608 Minn. 1993
- State v. Scott 501 N.W.2d 608 Minn. 1993
- State v. Christopherson 500 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-
State v. Christopherson
500 N.W.2d 794
Minn. Ct. App. 1993
3 (provides for admission of statements not otherwise admissible by statute or rules of evidence); (no need to rely on statute if statements admissible under rules of evidence).
- State v. Danowit 497 N.W.2d 636 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- State v. Danowit 497 N.W.2d 636 Minn. Ct. App. 1993