Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Russell, 477 N.W.2d 886.
- State v. Jaworsky 505 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-
State v. Jaworsky
505 N.W.2d 638
Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-89 (Minn.1991) (applying rational basis test to facially neutral criminal statute).
- Mitchell v. Steffen 504 N.W.2d 198 Minn. 1993
- City of Willmar v. Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. 498 N.W.2d 766 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- City of Willmar v. Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. 498 N.W.2d 766 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- In Re the Welfare of E.D.J. 492 N.W.2d 829 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-
In Re the Welfare of E.D.J.
492 N.W.2d 829
Minn. Ct. App. 1993
(since the early 1980s, the Minnesota Supreme Court has articulated a rational basis test in equal protection cases that differs from the federal standard); O’ (unlike the federal constitution, Article I, Section 10 of the state constitution requires a
- State v. Clausen 493 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1992
-
State v. Clausen
493 N.W.2d 113
Minn. 1992
The trial court then held the statute unconstitutional
- State v. Morrow 492 N.W.2d 539 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- State v. Morrow 492 N.W.2d 539 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Mitchell v. Steffen 487 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
-
Mitchell v. Steffen
487 N.W.2d 896
Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Respondents urge that we address this issue “to assure that Minnesota’s constitutional protections are maintained for the benefit of this state’s residents and will not be subject to attack in the United States Supreme Court.” -89 (Minn.1991), the supreme court articulated a rational basis test under the Minnesota Constitution which is different and more stringent than its federal counterpart.
- State v. Thompson 486 N.W.2d 163 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- State v. Thompson 486 N.W.2d 163 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- State v. Davidson 481 N.W.2d 51 Minn. 1992
-
State v. Davidson
481 N.W.2d 51
Minn. 1992
(six-member juries violate state constitution); (determination of fundamental rights not limited by federal Constitution); (Minnesota Constitution provides greater religious liberty than first amendment); (Minnesota equal protection analysis under art. I, § 2 is more demanding than federal).
- Backdahl v. Commissioner of Public Safety 479 N.W.2d 89 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Backdahl v. Commissioner of Public Safety 479 N.W.2d 89 Minn. Ct. App. 1992