Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Nicollet Restoration, Inc. v. Turnham, 486 N.W.2d 753.

27 citing documents.

Richard Preston Blackwell, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Removal from conciliation court commences a new civil action in district court, and “the district court is not required to give deference to the conciliation court’s decision nor is it bound by the conciliation court’s rules of practice.” Nicollet Restoration, d 508, 510 (Minn. App. 1991), aff’d
The Community Cares, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Nicollet Restoration, (noting that under the Minnesota constitution, the power to make rules governing the bar and who may practice law is vested exclusively in the supreme court).
Carl Green, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Nicollet Restoration, Inc. 6 v. Turnham , (stating that Minnesota “follows the common law rule that a corporation may appear only by attorney”).
Kelbro Company, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
upon removal to district court.” Nicollet Restoration, 9 aff’d, see also Minn. R. Civ.
In re the Marriage of: Nader Charles Kazeminy, Petitioner Below, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
10 See Nicollet Restoration, (“[A] corporation may appear only by attorney.”).
Hinckley Square Associates v. Leah D. Cervene 871 N.W.2d 426 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Hinckley Square Associates v. Leah D. Cervene 871 N.W.2d 426 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Cervene cited the Minnesota Supreme Court case Nicollet Restoration, for the proposition that artificial entities must be represented by licensed counsel when appearing in court.
Ahmadani Hassan Mohamed v. Eric Elijah Aaron Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ahmadani Hassan Mohamed v. Eric Elijah Aaron Minn. Ct. App. 2015
However, such reliance on conciliation court determinations would have been error because “[t]he conciliation court trial and the subsequent removal to district court are separate proceedings.” Nicollet Restoration, aff’d
Haugen v. Superior Development, Inc. 819 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Haugen v. Superior Development, Inc. 819 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
301 Clifton Place L.L.C. v. 301 Clifton Place Condominium Ass'n 783 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
301 Clifton Place L.L.C. v. 301 Clifton Place Condominium Ass'n 783 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
(quoting Nicollet Restoration, ).
Save Our Creeks v. City of Brooklyn Park 699 N.W.2d 307 Minn. 2005
Save Our Creeks v. City of Brooklyn Park 699 N.W.2d 307 Minn. 2005
Nicollet Restoration, Cary & Co. v. F.E.
Save Our Creeks v. City of Brooklyn Park 682 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Save Our Creeks v. City of Brooklyn Park 682 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In the Matter of Evjen 653 N.W.2d 212 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In the Matter of Evjen 653 N.W.2d 212 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re the Conservatorship of Miller 642 N.W.2d 75 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re the Conservatorship of Miller 642 N.W.2d 75 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
See Nicollet Restoration, (Minnesota follows common law rule that corporation must be represented by counsel to appear in court).
Gunderson v. Harrington 619 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Gunderson v. Harrington 619 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
“[A] corporation is an artificial entity which can only act through agents.” Nicollet Restoration
World Championship Fighting, Inc. v. Janos 609 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
World Championship Fighting, Inc. v. Janos 609 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Because a corporation may not make an appearance in district court unless it is represented by counsel, Nicollet Restoration, the court reasoned that the removal papers — filed without counsel — were ineffective, thus depriving the court of jurisdiction.
State v. Wolf 605 N.W.2d 381 Minn. 2000
State v. Wolf 605 N.W.2d 381 Minn. 2000
Cf. Nicollet Restoration, Inc., v. Turnham

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by