Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Northern States Power Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, 523 N.W.2d 657.

40 citing documents.

Bella Vista Condominium Association, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
King’s Cove Marina, LLC, Minn. 2021
Kyle Wendell Else, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Capistrant v. Lifetouch Nat'l Sch. Studios, Inc. 916 N.W.2d 23 Minn. 2018
Capistrant v. Lifetouch Nat'l Sch. Studios, Inc. 916 N.W.2d 23 Minn. 2018
Donnelly Bros. Construction Co. v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Co. 759 N.W.2d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Donnelly Bros. Construction Co. v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Co. 759 N.W.2d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Co. of N.Y., (emphasis added).
Wooddale Builders, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co. 722 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 2006
Wooddale Builders, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co. 722 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 2006
Wooddale Builders, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co. 695 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Wooddale Builders, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co. 695 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Co. of New York, (hereinafter NSP).
Westfield Insurance Co. v. Kroiss 694 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Westfield Insurance Co. v. Kroiss 694 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Duxbury v. Spex Feeds, Inc. 681 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Duxbury v. Spex Feeds, Inc. 681 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Co. of New York, , 663 n. 8 (Minn.1994).
Parr v. Gonzalez 669 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Parr v. Gonzalez 669 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Co., , 659-60 n. 3 (Minn.1994) (quotation omitted).
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 667 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 2003
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 667 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 2003
Under the “continuous trigger” theory, “the policies in effect at the time of exposure, the time of manifestation, and all the time in between are triggered.” (NSP).
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 652 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 652 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Co., , 659-60 n. 3 (Minn.1994) (quotation omitted).
Gopher Oil Co. v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co. 588 N.W.2d 756 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Gopher Oil Co. v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co. 588 N.W.2d 756 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
See Domtar, d at 732-33 (in difficult cases when exact dates are uncertain, court can presume continuous damage between a proven start date and an ending date); Northern States Power Co. v. Fidelity & Cos. Co., -64 (Minn.1994) (same).
Westling Manufacturing Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 581 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Westling Manufacturing Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 581 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Co., -63 (Minn.1994) (explaining and applying the “actual injury” rule to determine whether policy provides coverage).
Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co. 563 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1997
Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co. 563 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1997
Co. of New York, (“NSP ”), and held that any soil remediation costs incurred by Domtar at the behest of the MPCA should be allocated evenly from 1933 (when damage began) to the year in which clean-up efforts begin.
Landico, Inc. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 559 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Jenoff, Inc. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co. 558 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1997
Jenoff, Inc. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co. 558 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1997
Co. of New York, we cited Singsaas for the proposition that Minnesota has adopted an “actual injury” or “injury-in-fact” theory in determining which insurance policies have been triggered by an occurrence.
Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co. 552 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co. 552 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Jenoff, Inc. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co. 545 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Jenoff, Inc. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co. 545 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Co., (“NSP ”), in support of a conclusion that Jenoffs umbrella liability policy required damages during the policy period.
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Metropolitan Urology Clinic, P.A. 537 N.W.2d 297 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Metropolitan Urology Clinic, P.A. 537 N.W.2d 297 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
vide notice of loss and proof of loss is sufficient); see also Jostens, Inc. v. CNA Ins./Continental Casualty, (requirement of immediate notice should be construed strictly against the insurer and liberally against the insured; immediate notice need only be reasonably prompt under the circumstances), overruled on other grounds by NSP v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.
SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co. 536 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1995
SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co. 536 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1995
Tower argues that this court should adopt the “pro rata by time on the risk” theory of allocation first used by this court in Northern States Power Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of N.Y., -64 (Minn.1994) [hereinafter “NSP ”].
Fairview Hospital & Health Care Services v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 535 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1995
Fairview Hospital & Health Care Services v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 535 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1995