DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Ascher v. Commissioner of Public Safety, 519 N.W.2d 183.

82 citing documents.

  • State v. Johnson 645 N.W.2d 505 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • State v. Johnson 645 N.W.2d 505 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
    (concluding that sobriety checkpoint roadblocks are unconstitutional without individualized articula-ble suspicion of criminal wrongdoing); (determining police must have objective, individualized articulable suspicion of criminal wr
  • State v. Henning 644 N.W.2d 500 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • State v. Henning 644 N.W.2d 500 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
    Safety, (holding that police roadblocks were unconstitutional because Minnesota constitution requires individualized suspicion of wrongdoing before a stop).
  • State v. Larsen 637 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Larsen 637 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Anderson 620 N.W.2d 56 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • State v. Anderson 620 N.W.2d 56 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
    Safety, (articulating the burden for departure from the general requirement of individualized suspicion).
  • State v. Baumann 616 N.W.2d 771 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • State v. Neely 604 N.W.2d 120 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • State v. Neely 604 N.W.2d 120 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
    Safety (limited retroactive application of sobriety checkpoint unconstitutionality); Friedman v. Comm’r of Pub.
  • State v. Carter 596 N.W.2d 654 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Carter 596 N.W.2d 654 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Wilson 594 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • State v. Wilson 594 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • Baker v. State 590 N.W.2d 636 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Harris 590 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Harris 590 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 1999
    In support of his argument that, under Minnesota’s Constitution, he was seized when the police officers boarded the bus and announced their intent to search for drugs
  • Baker v. State 590 N.W.2d 636 Minn. 1999
    Safety, (limiting retroactive application of decision holding sobriety checkpoint roadblocks unconstitutional to cases pending on date of decision in which challenge to checkpoints properly raised); Friedman v. Comm'r of Pub.
  • State v. George 557 N.W.2d 575 Minn. 1997
  • State v. Fiebke 554 N.W.2d 755 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
  • State v. Fiebke 554 N.W.2d 755 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
  • State v. Greyeagle 541 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • State v. Greyeagle 541 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • Women of the State v. Gomez 542 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1995
  • Women of the State v. Gomez 542 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1995
    Safety, (warrantless searches at sobriety checkpoints); (seizure); Friedman v. Commissioner of Pub.
  • State v. Cripps 533 N.W.2d 388 Minn. 1995
  • State v. Cripps 533 N.W.2d 388 Minn. 1995
    Safety, -85 (Minn.1994).
  • Ascher v. Commissioner of Public Safety 527 N.W.2d 122 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • Ascher v. Commissioner of Public Safety 527 N.W.2d 122 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • Gray v. Commissioner of Public Safety 519 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1994
  • Gray v. Commissioner of Public Safety 519 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1994
    filed herewith, we are holding that police use of a temporary roadblock to stop cars and investigate a large number of drivers in the hope of discovering evidence of alcohol-impaired driving by some of them violates Minn. Const, art. I, § 10, which we have interpreted as generally requiring that police ma