Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Matter of Linehan, 518 N.W.2d 609.

108 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Milton Thomas. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
After finding each of their opinions to be credible, the district court considered the six factors listed in (Linehan 2 I), and the five factors from (Linehan IV), concluding that each factor supported commitment.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: John Joseph Kotowski. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: John Joseph Kotowski. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Gary George Spicer. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Gary George Spicer. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
at 22–23 ( (Linehan I)).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Stephen Danforth, a/k/a Stephen Rabideau. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Stephen Danforth, a/k/a Stephen Rabideau. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
15; In re Linehan (Linehan I)
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Charles Walter Bathel. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Charles Walter Bathel. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Kenneth Melvin Shue, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Kenneth Melvin Shue, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Matthew Alan Radke. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Matthew Alan Radke. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the CIVIL COMMITMENT OF Gary George SPICER 853 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the CIVIL COMMITMENT OF Gary George SPICER 853 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: John Howard Thuringer. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: John Howard Thuringer. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re Linehan (Linehan I)
In re the Civil Commitment of Ince 847 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 2014
In re the Civil Commitment of Ince 847 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 2014
We granted Ince’s petition for review to consider whether the factors relevant to the determination that a person is “likely to engage in acts of harmful sexual conduct,” as set forth in In re Linehan (Linehan I), require clarification or modification, and whether Ince met his burden of proving the existence of a less restrictive alternative to commitment.
In re the Civil Commitment of Crosby 824 N.W.2d 351 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
In re the Civil Commitment of Crosby 824 N.W.2d 351 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
18b; In re Linehan (Linehan I)
In re the Civil Commitment of Navratil 799 N.W.2d 643 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
In re the Civil Commitment of Navratil 799 N.W.2d 643 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
( (Linehan I), and (Linehan III), vacated on other grounds, 522 U.S. 1011 , 118 S.Ct.
In Re the Civil Commitment of Stone 711 N.W.2d 831 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re the Civil Commitment of Stone 711 N.W.2d 831 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re Thulin 660 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re Thulin 660 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re the Civil Commitment of Jackson 658 N.W.2d 219 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re the Civil Commitment of Jackson 658 N.W.2d 219 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re Martinelli 649 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re Martinelli 649 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re Kindschy 634 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Kindschy 634 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Hince v. O'KEEFE 632 N.W.2d 577 Minn. 2001
Hince v. O'KEEFE 632 N.W.2d 577 Minn. 2001
In Re Preston 629 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Preston 629 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Larson 605 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 2000
State v. Larson 605 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 2000
In Re Linehan 594 N.W.2d 867 Minn. 1999
Joelson v. O'KEEFE 594 N.W.2d 905 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Joelson v. O'KEEFE 594 N.W.2d 905 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
In fact, it was unnecessary to do so because the court had recently addressed the relevant, standard, stating “the burden is on the state to prove by clear and convincing evidence, each of the three elements set out in Pearson.”
Matter of Linehan 557 N.W.2d 171 Minn. 1996
Matter of Linehan 557 N.W.2d 171 Minn. 1996
In Re Linehan 544 N.W.2d 308 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re Linehan 544 N.W.2d 308 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Call v. Gomez 535 N.W.2d 312 Minn. 1995
Call v. Gomez 535 N.W.2d 312 Minn. 1995
744 (1940); (applying Pearson construction of statute), reh’g denied (Minn., Aug.
Matter of Pirkl 531 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Matter of Pirkl 531 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 1995