Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Metropolitan Transit Commission, 538 N.W.2d 692.

28 citing documents.

Ayers v. Kalal 925 N.W.2d 291 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Ayers v. Kalal 925 N.W.2d 291 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Transit Comm'n , , 695 (Minn. 1995) ("[T]he [No-Fault] Act has replaced the no-fault insurer's common law rights to subrogation and indemnity with very limited statutory rights.").
Marriage of Crowley v. Meyer 897 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 2017
Marriage of Crowley v. Meyer 897 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 2017
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, (A13-2176), GEICO Insurance Company, (A14-0167) v. Metropolitan Council, Lashandra Scott, (A13-2176), Adelfa … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, (A13-2176), GEICO Insurance Company, (A14-0167) v. Metropolitan Council, Lashandra Scott, (A13-2176), Adelfa … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Northwestern National Insurance Co. v. Carlson 711 N.W.2d 821 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Northwestern National Insurance Co. v. Carlson 711 N.W.2d 821 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Transit Comm’n, -96 (Minn.1995), the supreme court examined when the right of indemnity accrues for an insurer who pays no-fault, economic-loss benefits to a claimant injured through the negligent use of a public bus.
State Farm v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 678 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State Farm v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 678 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Transit Comm’n, aff 'd on other grounds by
Kolton v. County of Anoka 645 N.W.2d 403 Minn. 2002
Kolton v. County of Anoka 645 N.W.2d 403 Minn. 2002
Transit Comm’n, , 695 *407 (Minn.1995).
Prior Lake American v. Mader 642 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 2002
Prior Lake American v. Mader 642 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 2002
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Great West Casualty Co. 623 N.W.2d 894 Minn. 2001
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Great West Casualty Co. 623 N.W.2d 894 Minn. 2001
Transit Comm’n, with State Farm Mut.
Associated Builders & Contractors v. Ventura 610 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 2000
Associated Builders & Contractors v. Ventura 610 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 2000
Co. v. Metropolitan Transit Comm’n
Simpson v. American Family Insurance Co. 603 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Simpson v. American Family Insurance Co. 603 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Co. v. Metropolitan Transit Comm’n, (noting that it would be commercially impracticable and unreasonable to require insurers to pay benefits before there is actual loss).
State Ex Rel. Morrow v. LaFleur 590 N.W.2d 787 Minn. 1999
State Ex Rel. Morrow v. LaFleur 590 N.W.2d 787 Minn. 1999
Co. v. Metropolitan Transit Comm’n, (stating that where the only questions before the court are questions of law, “no deference need be given to the decisions below”).
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Spartz 588 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Spartz 588 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Co. v. Metropolitan Transit Comm’n
Bol v. Cole 561 N.W.2d 143 Minn. 1997
Bol v. Cole 561 N.W.2d 143 Minn. 1997
Co. v. Metropolitan Transit Comm’n
Hermeling v. Minnesota Fire & Casualty Co. 548 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 1996
Hermeling v. Minnesota Fire & Casualty Co. 548 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 1996
Co. v. Metropolitan Transit Comm’n

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by