C3-95-563
Precedential
Affirmed
Processed
Hoagland v. State
Cited by
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Szymialis 557 N.W.2d 554 Minn. 1997
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Hoagland v. State 518 N.W.2d 531
- Matter of Buckhalton 518 N.W.2d 531
Opinion text
ORDER Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the order of the district court dated March 2,1995, denying defendant, Leland M. Hoagland, a new trial after a remand hearing pursuant to Hoagland v. State, 518 N.W.2d 531 (Minn. 1994) be, and the same is, affirmed. The trial court on remand concluded, on the basis of detailed findings, that the state had met its burden of proving that the state would be unduly prejudiced by having to retry the case. Affirmed. BY THE COURT: /s/ Alan C. Page Alan C. Page Associate Justice