DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Soto, 562 N.W.2d 299.

66 citing documents.

  • State v. Hager 727 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
    The factors that we use to determine whether the offenses constitute a single behavioral incident include “time, place, and whether the offenses were motivated by a desire to obtain a single criminal objective.”
  • State v. Carr 692 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
  • State v. Carr 692 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
    “The determination of whether multiple offenses are part of a single behavioral act under section 609.035 is not a mechanical test, but involves an examination of all the facts and circumstances.”
  • State v. Bertsch 689 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Bertsch 689 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Heath 685 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Heath 685 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Monaco 83 P.3d 553 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
  • State v. Johnson 653 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • State v. Johnson 653 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • State v. McIntosh 641 N.W.2d 3 Minn. 2002
  • State v. McIntosh 641 N.W.2d 3 Minn. 2002
    303 n. 7 (Minn.1997) (internal citations omitted).
  • State v. Richardson 633 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Richardson 633 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Barnes 618 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • State v. Barnes 618 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
    (holding three sales of heroin on separate days within same week not single behavioral incident); (holding that multiple drug sales were not single behavioral incident).