Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Chambers, 589 N.W.2d 466.
- State of Minnesota v. Claude Riley Crockson, Jr. 854 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
State of Minnesota v. Claude Riley Crockson, Jr.
854 N.W.2d 244
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
We “assume that the jury believed all of the state’s witnesses and disbelieved any evidence to the contrary.”
- State of Minnesota v. Michael Arthur Boelz Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Michael Arthur Boelz Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Michael William Schneider Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Michael William Schneider Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- State v. Chavarria-Cruz 839 N.W.2d 515 Minn. 2013
- Chambers v. State 831 N.W.2d 311 Minn. 2013
- State v. Zornes 831 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 2013
-
Chambers v. State
831 N.W.2d 311
Minn. 2013
State v. Chambers (Chambers I), see U.S. Const, amend.
- State v. Zornes 831 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 2013
- State v. Nelson 806 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
- State v. Nelson 806 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
- State v. Rhoads 802 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
- State v. Rhoads 802 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
- State v. Thompson 788 N.W.2d 485 Minn. 2010
-
State v. Thompson
788 N.W.2d 485
Minn. 2010
-98 (Minn.2009) (declining to overturn precedent because defendant failed to show a compelling reason to do so); -80 (Minn.1999) (holding that as applied to a 17-year-old convicted of murdering a peace officer, life in prison without the possibility of release does not constitute cruel or unusual punishment).
- State v. Hull 788 N.W.2d 91 Minn. 2010
- State v. Hull 788 N.W.2d 91 Minn. 2010
- State v. McDaniel 777 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 2010
-
State v. McDaniel
777 N.W.2d 739
Minn. 2010
of showing that our culture and laws emphatically and well nigh universally reject the sentence.” -80 (Minn.1999) (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
- State v. Bauer 776 N.W.2d 462 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
- State v. Bauer 776 N.W.2d 462 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
- State v. Fardan 773 N.W.2d 303 Minn. 2009
- State v. Martin 773 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 2009
- State v. Martin 773 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 2009
- Holt v. State 772 N.W.2d 470 Minn. 2009
- State v. Jackson 770 N.W.2d 470 Minn. 2009
- State v. Jackson 770 N.W.2d 470 Minn. 2009
- Chambers v. State 769 N.W.2d 762 Minn. 2009
- Chambers v. State 769 N.W.2d 762 Minn. 2009
- State v. Stone 767 N.W.2d 735 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
- State v. Stone 767 N.W.2d 735 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
- State v. Lehman 749 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
- State v. Lehman 749 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
- Rud v. Fabian 743 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
-
Rud v. Fabian
743 N.W.2d 295
Minn. Ct. App. 2007
We presume that this amendment was “passed by the legislature ‘with deliberation and full knowledge of all existing legislation on the subject and regarded by the lawmakers as being part of a connected whole.’ ” (quoting Kaljuste v. Hennepin County Sanatorium Comm’n, 240 Minn. 407, 414 , ).
- State v. Franks 742 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- State v. Franks 742 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- State v. Heden 719 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 2006
-
State v. Heden
719 N.W.2d 689
Minn. 2006
“Statutes are presumed constitutional, and a person challenging a sentence as cruel or unusual ‘bears the “heavy burden” * * * of showing that our culture and laws emphatically and well nigh universally reject’ the sentence.” -80 (Minn.1999) (alteration in original) (quoting Harris v. Wright, 93 F.3d 581, 583 (9th Cir.1996)).
- State v. Mogler 719 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
- State v. Mogler 719 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
- Stringer v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club, LLC 705 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 2005
- State v. Martin 695 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 2005
- State v. Martin 695 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 2005
- State v. Reese 692 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 2005
- State v. Reese 692 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 2005
- Stringer v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club, LLC 686 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- Stringer v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club, LLC 686 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 2004